The Supreme Court ruled against the Tucson inventor of a Spider-Man toy Monday, saying Marvel Enterprises no longer has to pay him royalties. Stephen Kimble had argued that a previous court ruling, cutting off royalty payments after a patent expires, is outdated and anti-competitive and needs to be overturned. Read more» 1
to our supporters
- Ernie Pyle
- Hunter S. Thompson
- Fund for Investigative Journalism
- Ida Tarbell
- Access Tucson
- The Alben F. Bates and Clara G. Bates Foundation
- Maeve Robertson
- Tom Volgy
- Javier Duran
- Terry Bracy
- & many more!
We rely on readers like you. Join them & contribute to the Sentinel today!
Stephen Kimble had no idea that the toy web-shooter he designed two decades ago during an afternoon reading comic books with his son would wind up in the Supreme Court. But the Tucson man and Marvel were there arguing over law that guides royalties on the toy. Read more»
A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Marvel Enterprises Inc. no longer has to pay royalties to the Tucson inventor of a Spider-Man web-shooter, after the patent on the toy expired. A reluctant panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court‘s ruling against Stephen Kimble in a published opinion. Read more» 1