Now Reading
Goddard: Dark money tries to deceive seniors

From the archive: This story is more than 5 years old.

Candidate commentary

Goddard: Dark money tries to deceive seniors

The 60 Plus Association describes itself as a "non-partisan seniors advocacy group," but like anything involving dark money, what they say is far from true.

The 60 Plus Association, in fact, is a Koch Brothers-backed front group that floods our airwaves with political ads paid for with anonymous corporate cash designed to distort our elections and deceive voters.

But it also has another purpose: to advocate for the privatization of Social Security.

60 Plus is a major player in the fight for Social Security privatization. That proposal was the brainchild of hedge fund managers who would profit from privatization and who write big checks to political organizations, not seniors who rely on Social Security.

The focus of my campaign for secretary of state has been stopping dark money. I have made it clear from the first day of my campaign that I am running to stop the anonymous corporate cash flooding into Arizona, one of the biggest threats to our democracy.

So I can't say I was particularly surprised when a dark money group attacked me. But the fact that 60 Plus chose me as a target tells you a lot about the twisted world of dark money.

As your attorney general, I worked tirelessly with AARP to protect Arizona's seniors from fraud. I started the volunteer Fraud Fighters and Seniors Strike Back programs. One major source of fraud comes from fake charities that exist only to scam seniors.

Arizona law used to require charities to register with the secretary of state – which at least gave consumers and law enforcement a good place to start to figure out if a charity was legit. But last year, the Legislature stripped the secretary of state of that authority — a move my opponent supported and the Arizona Nonprofit Alliance opposed.

That move created not only an opening for scam artists; it also created an opening for dark money. dark money groups are formed as charitable, rather than political, organizations in order to keep their donors hidden. Allowing them to avoid registering with the Secretary of State's Office provided even more secrecy for these groups.

If elected, I'll fight to bring back the requirement that charities register as one important way to protect our seniors from fraud. But 60 Plus — that "non-partisan seniors advocacy group" — just spent $300,000 attacking me for holding that position.

Only in the twisted world of dark money does it makes sense that a "non-partisan seniors advocacy group" would want to privatize Social Security and make it easier for fraud to be committed against seniors. Dark money is a fraud on Arizona voters and we must work together to stop it.

Candidate commentaries

We've had a number of recent inquiries from political candidates (and their representatives), wondering about our policies on publishing op-ed submissions.

Candidates for offices that represent Southern Arizonans are welcome to submit guest opinion pieces for publication. Here's what we're looking for, and what we're not. accepts policy statements, explaining a politician's reasoning for a stance on a specific issue.

We don't put word limits on guest opinions; if you're boring the reader, you're only hurting your own cause. The same is true if you're so pithy that you don't explain yourself and back up your claims with facts.

Submissions by candidates should be on point — please address issues relevant to the office which you seek.

Please include:

  • Concrete, specific solutions to problems — including defining costs and proposed revenue sources
  • An honest assessment of the challenges faced in dealing with an issue
  • Links to authoritative, independent sources, including news reports on the topic at hand

What we don't accept:

  • Repetitions of campaign or partisan rhetoric. Tell our readers — the people whom you wish to represent — something that's more than buzzwords.
  • Fundraising appeals. is an independent, nonprofit organization. Please don't attempt to abuse our good standing by attempting to raise money, including by linking to outside fundraising pages.
  • "Vote for me" appeals. Ditto. Explain what you'll do in clear language, and if somebody agrees with you, they might vote for you. But including an election "ask" is asking us to hit the delete button.
  • Attacks on other candidates. While it's fair to contrast one approach to another, particularly when backed up with facts, we're not interested in publishing hit pieces. Save that for your campaign advertisements (which we don't accept, by the way). Focus on your platform, not your opponent.
  • Don't expect us to publish a press release. While many candidates have paid staff generating their written words for them, we'll only publish op-eds that are at least penned in the voice of the candidate.

In the interest of fairness, we are highly unlikely to publish submissions made within a week of the Election Day for a particular primary or general election. Nor are we likely to publish more than a single op-ed from a candidate per week.

We accept candidate guest opinions to spark discussion among voters and the general public, not to back any particular candidate or point of view. We do not endorse political candidates. The public, including other candidates, will be allowed the opportunity to comment on all published op-eds, and all op-eds may be analyzed and fact-checked by reporters. We reserve the right to decline to publish submissions.

Please email submissions to Include your op-ed in the body of the email, rather than using an attachment.

— 30 —

Best in Internet Exploder