Sponsored by

Opinion

Note: This story is more than 1 year old.

Sentinel's Ingram wins 1st place Investigative Reporting award from Az Press Club

TucsonSentinel.com journalists win multiple awards for photography, breaking news & public service reporting

Click photo to enlarge

Paul Ingram at work. - original photo by John de Dios/TucsonSentinel.com

The top community investigative reporter in the state is TucsonSentinel.com's Paul Ingram, who took first place for a probe of the immigration bonds system. Ingram also won photography awards, and Dylan Smith was awarded for Public Service Journalism.

Ingram, the Sentinel's senior reporter, was recognized for his work on "'Insane' immigration bonds: Spiraling costs, Trump policies strain migrant families," an investigation published last December:

Even as the immigration court system becomes more and more backlogged — rising to more than 1 million cases in September — and detention facilities managed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have hit record levels, holding more than 50,000 people nationwide, immigration officials are seeking much higher bonds for immigrants, or refusing them altogether.

In a recent Arizona case, a woman was told she would be detained unless she paid a bond of more than $40,000. A little more than a decade ago, the median cost of an immigration bond was just $50. Coupled with the spiraling costs, hundreds of millions of dollars that should have been returned to those who filed bonds and who complied with their legal responsibilities have instead been held back by federal authorities. Read more »

The story was a "good example of accountability reporting, exposing an issue that impacts an underserved community," said investigative contest judge Mark Rochester, the editor-in-chief of Type Investigations and vice president of the national group Investigative Reporters and Editors.

"Building this story took weeks of reporting and interviews with at least a dozen sources, to dig through a complicated subject," Ingram said. " I'm really proud that the Arizona Press Club acknowledged  this story."

Ingram's reporting on the staggering increase in the cost of immigration bonds was supported in part with a grant from the Fund for Investigative Journalism, for which he expressed thanks.

Ingram also received three other awards from the Arizona Press Club, which announced a selection of award winners recognizing the top print/online journalists in the state this week.

Like what you're reading? Support high-quality local journalism and help underwrite independent news without the spin.

He was selected as the second-place winner in the Picture Story category, for his capturing a 2019 community event in "Thousands walk & dance in Tucson's All Souls Procession."

He was also a second-place winner in the Pictorial category for his photojournalism in "Lukeville Sunrise," which caught the morning light over the protected Organ Pipe Cactus National Wildlife Refuge on the U.S.-Mexico border, where the Trump administration has begun constructing a 30-foot barrier.

Ingram was named the third-place winner for Community Breaking News, for his report "Scott Warren found not guilty by jury in No More Deaths case," part of an extensive series of reports he filed from the courtroom for both of the trials of the humanitarian aid activist.

Dylan Smith, the Sentinel's editor and publisher, was recognized with second place in Community Public Service Journalism for a series of reports on the hollowing-out of Tucson's local press, with a focus on the Arizona Daily Star and its chain media ownership:

- 30 -
have your say   

Comments

There are no comments on this report. Sorry, comments are closed.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Read all of TucsonSentinel.com's
coronavirus reporting here »

Categories

news, politics & government, border, media & journalism, local, arizona, opinion, editorial, breaking, 1000 px

TucsonSentinel.com publishes analysis and commentary from a variety of community members, experts, and interest groups as a catalyst for a healthy civic conversation; we welcome your comments. As an organization, we don't endorse candidates or back specific legislation. All opinions are those of the individual authors.