Sponsored by

Comments on

Fein: A change is needed for Pima County's attorney

We need to break the 44-year Neely-LaWall stranglehold on that office and move in a new direction with more accountability for for the citizens of Pima County. Laura Conover is the person to do it. ... Read more»

have your say   

2 comments on this story

1
2 comments
Jul 17, 2020, 2:52 pm
- +

It is important that conversations about the race for County be undertaken with complete candor. My name is Steve Neely. I was Pima County Attorney from 1976-96. I have some knowledge about some of Jimmy Fein’s topics here which puts me a step ahead of him.

First, let me touch on the topic “hand picked.” I was endorsed by my predecessor, but I was not hand picked him or by anyone. I was also endorsed by two other previous county attorneys and they didn’t hand pick me either. I was re-elected four times by wide margins so perhaps the voters who knew me well hand picked me. That is as it should be.

When I was leaving office my two Chief Deputies informed me that they would run for the office. Barbara was one of them. I didn’t solicit or hand pick either of them to run. I did endorse Barbara in the primary because she was running against a defense attorney. I believed then as I believe now for obvious reasons that a career defense attorney has no business running the County Attorney’s Office. That would be Jimmy’s proverbial fox in the henhouse, wouldn’t it?

Jimmy should remember that after Barbara won her primary, I endorsed both candidates, because both were experienced prosecutors. So much for “hand picked.”

Finally, as to his absurd contention that somehow “accountability” can be improved by electing his defense attorney friend, let me point out that prosecutors are held accountable by judges, including on appeal and by the Bar Association. County Attorneys are held accountable by the voters. Between us, his so-called “Neely-LaWall stranglehold” was renewed nine times by the voters of this county. Defense attorneys and their criminal clients probably didnt approve, but then they shouldn’t have the right of approval, should they?

2
1 comments
Jul 21, 2020, 5:50 pm
- +

Steve Neely wrote a reply to the OpEd article I wrote that appeared in your newspaper. 

Steve resigned from the Pima County Attorney’s office before his term expired in 1996.  As near as I can recall, Steve and his wonderful and beautiful wife Lynn decided to pick up and move to New Zealand with their young family and seek citizenship there.  He apparently wanted nothing further to do with our city, county, state or country, which of course is his right.  Now, out of nowhere, he reappears representing himself as an expert on Pima County Democratic politics after being absent for more than 25 years of inactivity.  Makes you wonder about who contacted him and his motivation to speak after all these years.

Steve was preceded in office by Dennis DeConcini, an outstanding County Attorney who of course went on to serve 3 distinguished terms in the United States Senate.  Dennis was not a prosecutor nor even a trial lawyer for that matter, but he was an excellent administrator and it served him well.  In my opinion, he was the best County Attorney in my lifetime in Tucson, without any prosecutorial experience. 

Steve, you don’t need to be a career prosecutor to be a good county attorney.  You need someone with administrative experience and knowledge of criminal law. How many cases did you try after you became County Attorney?…..none I recall.

Steve I don’t know if you even live in Pima County or the United States but your views on this office are outdated and passe. 

Laura Conover will lead this office just as Dennis DeConcini did with honor and distinction.  She has full knowledge of criminal law and is an experienced administrator.  Time for a change my friend!

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Categories

news, politics & government, crime & safety, local, arizona, opinion, guest opinion, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1767
  • Dylan Smith: 553
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • EllieMae: 197
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$15/mo. Printer's Devil
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Trusted Source
$1,000 Copy Desk Chief
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Printer's Devil
$50 Cub reporter
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sponsored by

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

Sponsored by
find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by