Sponsored by

Comments on

How the GOP can lose the City Council forever

Ward-only (only) is what Republicans want. But here's what it means: The GOP is likely to win two seats representing Tucson's East Side wards. There is no path to three. Today, the party needs four votes to control the Council. They're rejecting an election plan that would give them a path to a majority.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

1
3 comments
Mar 30, 2016, 7:03 am
-4 +1

Dear Blake,

You are so pompous writing this piece it actually immediately disqualifies you from having one ounce of common sense and objectivity. 

Believable nah, moronic yes, collusion with the Kool Aid Sheeple who vote every election season in the City because a “D” resides next to their name….....a resounding yes.

As a student of History studying objectively my entire life (with many more anos then author), with a specialty in politics, and a degree in Broadcast Journalism from a real School in NY your article is a joke.

The average Tucson voter gets and understands voting by Ward and those ramifications versus a City Wide vote. It’s your pompous, snickering; narcissism is where you go off the rails.

Calling former Mayor Bob Walkup a “Republican” is like calling Bernie Sanders a “Moderate” get real for 5 seconds.

Look around Mr. Morlock how is that former community I lived in, loved, raised a family, and volunteered for many organizations to improve the lives of others for 35 years doing????  Ask yourself how are the roads, how is the economy, how is the #5 rated poverty community in the US, that huge mountain of debt the City is in?  How are all the things that the Democrat controlled City Council are successfully executing on behalf of the “Citizens of Tucson” going?

Maybe if you actually were an objective “columnist”, or even a real “journalist” you would write about what needs to change for a better more improved “quality of life”, “economic sustainability”, “great place to live” Tucson could be if the year in year out democrats removed narcissism and their obsession with maintaining their power structure and keep those Tucsonan’s dumbed down you actually might be positively contributing to the greater good in the “Old Pueblo”.

Just remember there are still good people in Tucson who don’t buy your little vile “let’s make republicans” feel bad piece.  Keeping the “Citizenry Divided” is a whole additional topic that is probably too deep for you.

Oh you are so smart Mr. Blake…........I’m getting a thrill up my leg how much this article really helps and supports the Citizens of Tucson.

2
22 comments
Mar 30, 2016, 9:02 am
-0 +4

Everyone’s entitled to their opinion but you may be interested to know I’ve called out the all-Democratic City Council on politicizing zoning issues, economic development and was all up in their grills during the bus strike. I invite you to read those. The point of the column is to urge Republicans to maintain their viability.
Thanks for reading.

3
1770 comments
Mar 30, 2016, 9:28 am
-2 +1

The addition of two “at-large” seats really does look to me like an attempt by the Dems to rig the game to keep themselves in charge. Tucson already has an “at-large” council member….the Mayor. What other reason in the world would they need more for, if not to give themselves an advantage?

Regardless of whether or not Tucson goes city-wide or ward only (BTW, I am very happy to see that they now have to choose one or the other), I would LOVE to see, and be very interested in what would happen, if all mention of political parties were removed from the ballot. How would the voters who look for the “DEM” before they look for the name react? They would curl up in the fetal position and start crying, then start spinning yarns about voter suppression.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Bill Morrow/Flickr

Categories

news, politics & government, local, arizona, opinion, analysis, breaking, columnist
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1767
  • Dylan Smith: 553
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • EllieMae: 197
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$15/mo. Printer's Devil
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Trusted Source
$1,000 Copy Desk Chief
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Printer's Devil
$50 Cub reporter
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sponsored by

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

Sponsored by
find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by