Sponsored by


Protesters take sides, as Supreme Court takes up Texas abortion law

The future of abortion rights was not strictly the issue before the Supreme Court when it took up Texas’ strict abortion law Monday, but that was not evident from the scores of protesters who gathered outside the court.

Both sides gathered for a largely peaceful rally, where most of the action was a protest version of whack-a-mole, with each side jockeying to get its signs and its message in front of the other.

“As a Texan, as someone who’s had all their abortions in Texas, I think it’s really important that they hear from people who had abortions,” said Kenya Martin, an abortion storyteller with We Testify, which is dedicated to ending the stigma surrounding abortion.

But Brooke Paz said the voices that need to be heard are those of “the pre-born.”

“We’re here outside the Supreme Court to give a voice to the voiceless, the pre-born, who don’t get a choice on whether they live or die,” said Paz, government affairs coordinator for Students For Life Action.

Students For Life Action was a sea of red outside the court, with members in red T-shirts bearing red signs and heart-shaped balloons for the rally. They were just one of many protesters wielding signs ranging from “Liberal Atheist Against Abortion” to “Catholics for Choice.”

Despite the emotional issue, the protesters were mostly low-key, with both sides settling down to listen as arguments were piped over loudspeakers on the court plaza.

Inside the court, the justices were hearing two challenges to Senate Bill 8, the Texas law that effectively bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, usually at about six weeks.

Thanks to our donors and sponsors for their support of local independent reporting. Join Erika O'Dowd, Fran Dostillio, and Pamela Hyde-Nakai and contribute today!

On its face, that would appear to violate previous Supreme Court rulings that bar states from placing undue burdens on a woman’s right to get an abortion before fetal viability, typically considered at least 24 weeks.

But critics have been unable to block the Texas law, which took effect Sept. 1, because it entrusts enforcement to private citizens, not state officials. That has made it impossible for opponents to sue the state and put the law on hold while they challenge it in courts.

Under SB 8, Texans who sue abortion providers or anyone who “aids or abets” somone getting an abortion after fetal “cardiac activity,” stand to get a minimum of $10,000 if their suit is successful. Critics have said the law amounts to making “bounty hunters” of state residents who can file suit repeatedly with no consequences.

U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar called SB 8 little more than an attempt by Texas to “act in direct defiance” of the court’s previous rulings on abortion, and warned that other rights would be targeted by other states if the law is allowed to stand.

That thread was picked up by several justices during arguments.

“So this is not limited to abortion,” said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, citing other possible targets like same-sex marriage or Second Amendment rights. “That’s the point that’s been raised. It’s limited to any law that a state thinks it’s dissatisfied with.”

Texas Solicitor General Judd Stone II argued that Congress could intervene if it felt that federal courts should be able to weigh in on what he said should be decided in state courts. But Justice Elena Kagan said that constitutional rights, like the privacy right to an abortion, should not face such hurdles.

“I mean, isn’t the point of a right that you don’t have to ask Congress?” Kagan asked. “Isn’t the point of a right that it doesn’t really matter what Congress thinks or what the majority of the American people think as to that right?”

While the case is pending, the law is in effect, which has led to a sharp drop in abortions in Texas. That’s what brought out Martin, who said “abortion is healthcare and it’s necessary.”

“As someone who worked in an abortion clinic in Texas, I think it’s important that I show up here today,” Martin said. “I feel like it’s my obligation to people like me who aren’t necessarily ready to be loud and proud and bold about abortion.”

Sponsorships available
Support TucsonSentinel.com & let thousands of daily readers know
your business cares about creating a HEALTHIER, MORE INFORMED Tucson

The Texas law is just the first of two high-profile abortion cases the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear this term. On Dec. 1, it will hear a challenge to a Mississippi law that would make abortion illegal after 15 weeks, a direct challenge to the court’s previous rulings on abortion rights.

Activists on both sides are already looking to the future.

“Normally what happens in Texas kind of sets the tone, so I am concerned that what’s happening in Texas can trickle down to other places,” Martin said.

Paz hopes for the opposite.

“We are excited to see some other states that are going to get creative as well to protect their pre-born. We believe that abortion is harmful to both women and babies, we know that to be true, so we want what’s best for them,” Paz said.

- 30 -
have your say   


There are no comments on this report. Sorry, comments are closed.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Read all of TucsonSentinel.com's
coronavirus reporting here »

Click image to enlarge

Diannie Chavez/Cronkite News

While the Supreme Court heard arguments over SB 8, the restrictive Texas abortion law, demonstrators outside were mostly low-key and peaceful Monday morning, sitting and listening to arguments over loudspeakers after a round of protesting and counter-protesting.


news, politics & government, crime & safety, health, nation/world, breaking, Cronkite News