Sponsored by


Note: This story is more than 3 years old.

Pentagon defends use of active-duty troops on border

Pentagon officials told House lawmakers last week that there’s nothing unusual about the 2,300 active-duty troops at the Mexican border, calling it in line with similar deployments under previous administrations.

Another 3,750 troops will be deployed soon, officials said over the weekend, bringing the total number of troops to about 6,000. Another 2,000 National Guard personnel are also deployed along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Undersecretary of Defense for Policy John Rood and Vice Adm. Michael Gilday opened their testimony to the House Armed Services Committee by saying the Defense Department has “a long history of supporting efforts to secure U.S. borders,” beginning in the early 1990s.

“We believe our military support enables CBP (Customs and Border Protection) to do their duties at ports of entry,” Gilday testified.

But most of the earlier deployments cited in their testimony involved National Guard troops, and Democrats on the committee called it “highly unusual” for active-duty soldiers to be on the border providing support.

“There’s really not much evidence that right at the moment it is a crisis that would call for the, if not unprecedented, then highly unusual step of sending active-duty troops to the border,” said Rep. Adam Smith, D-Washington, the chairman of the committee.

Democrats were also concerned that troop presence would grow if President Donald Trump follows through on his threat to declare a national emergency in order to fund border wall construction without explicit congressional approval.

Trump first sent troops to the border in April, when about 2,000 National Guardsmen were deployed by border state governors, with federal funding, to work in support roles for Homeland Security agents.

Like what you're reading? Support high-quality local journalism and help underwrite independent news without the spin.

In October, the president turned to active-duty soldiers in response to what he called a threat from a caravan of Central American migrants that was headed to the U.S. At its peak, the deployment included 5,900 active-duty soldiers.

None of the troops, active or guard, is allowed to be involved in the apprehension of immigrants. They can only offer support services, such as maintaining vehicles, manning surveillance equipment and helping fortify border barriers and ports of entry.

Troops have so far strung 70 miles of concertina wire, helped with engineering, transported border agents and loaned them protective equipment, among other tasks, Rood said. Military leaders recently said soldiers will operate mobile surveillance equipment through at least Sept. 30, and place another 150 miles of razor wire by March 31.

Total cost for active and guard troop deployments will be $448 million for the fiscal year, Gilday said. He said there is “minimal to no additional” cost for active troops compared to guardsmen.

Gilday discussed the operations in terms of being good training for most of the troops and said the deployment would not affect military readiness. It could improve readiness, Gilday said.

Both men said the secretary of Homeland Security requests the troops but which units are dispatched and how they are assigned is the decision of the defense secretary.

“Active-duty military personnel were selected because the secretary of Defense determined them to be the best-suited and most readily available forces,” their prepared testimony stated. “We adjust as necessary to meet mission requirements, while minimizing impacts on readiness.”

Republican lawmakers at the hearing said the deployment is a needed and not unusual step.

“What the administration has done is in line with … the sort of things that we have asked the military to do for a long, long time,” said Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas.

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Alabama, argued there would be no need to deploy troops if Homeland Security was adequately funded.

Support TucsonSentinel.com today, because a smarter Tucson is a better Tucson.

“What’s it going to take for us to not have to continue this pattern?” he said. “We’re going to have to adequately fund the Department of Homeland Security instead of continually reaching into DoD to subsidize that department.”

Rogers added that “we continue to act stupid in Congress,” fighting the president over $5.7 billion in border wall funding that led to a partial government shutdown cost the U.S. economy $11 billion.

The 35-day shutdown ended with passage of a short-term budget extension and an agreement by House and Senate leaders to negotiate on border wall funding. Trump has said that if he does not get the funding he wants, he could close the government again in two weeks or declare a national emergency. Such a move would allow him to draw money from other funds -- including the Defense Department -- udget to pay for the wall.

Many committee Democrats asked about that possibility, but Rood would only say there has been “prudent planning” on the issue. He would not elaborate on the cost or the operations of the wall, but said that if Trump declared an emergency and directed the Pentagon to act, it would build the wall “if we judged it to be a lawful order.”

“And I assume it would be,” he said.

- 30 -
have your say   


There are no comments on this report. Sorry, comments are closed.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Read all of TucsonSentinel.com's
coronavirus reporting here »

Click image to enlarge

Staff Sgt. Rubin J. Tan/U.S. Marine Corps

U.S. Marines with 7th Engineer Support Battalion place concertina wire at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry in California on Nov. 11, as part of the deployment of thousands of active-duty troops to support border security efforts.


news, politics & government, border, crime & safety, war, local, arizona, nation/world, mexico/latin america, breaking, Cronkite News