Sponsored by

Nation/World

Note: This story is more than 10 years old.

PIPA vote postponed

Protests, blackouts may have influenced Reid's decision

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid postponed a procedural vote that would decide the fate of the Protect Intellectual Property Act or PIPA, according to the Associated Press.

Pressure from protests and blackouts held by internet giants such as Wikipedia may have influenced Reid's decision, reported Politico. Reid said, "In light of recent events, I have decided to postpone Tuesday's vote on the PROTECT IP Act."

In his statement, printed by The Washington Post, he added, "There is no reason that the legitimate issues raised by many about this bill cannot be resolved. Counterfeiting and piracy cost the American economy billions of dollars and thousands of jobs each year, with the movie industry alone supporting over 2.2 million jobs. We must take action to stop these illegal practices."

Both PIPA and SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) were designed to protect against copyright infringement and intellectual property theft, but critics have called the measures suggested in the bills draconian.

Politico reported that Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) are negotiating the removal of a provision that would require search engines to delete links to “suspected rogue sites” from appearing in search results.

But compromise may come too late, as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell urged Congress to set the legislation aside on Thursday. The Huffington Post reported on his statement:

Rather than prematurely bringing the PROTECT IP Act to the Senate floor, we should first study and resolve the serious issues with this legislation. Considering this bill without first doing so could be counterproductive to achieving the shared goal of enacting appropriate and additional tools to combat the theft of intellectual property.

This article originally appeared on GlobalPost.

- 30 -
have your say   

1 comment on this story

1
1770 comments
Jan 20, 2012, 1:23 pm
-0 +0

I wrote my congressperson and both my senators about the how bad these bills are. Kyl was the only one of the three that showed me the respect of personally responding to my correspondence. In his letter, he pretty much told me that he’s drinking the kool-aid that was stirred by the $94 million of “campaign contributions”. So, I’m surprised he’s involved in negotiating changes.

Counterfeiting and piracy cost the American economy billions of dollars and thousands of jobs each year,

Blah blah blah I am sick to death of hearing this argument. I don’t believe it. I’m not seeing too many actors or musicians begging for change or applying for food stamps. I’m still seeing movies with a budget of $40 million end up bringing well over $250
million.

The entertainment industry isn’t upset about losing their profits, because they’re not. What they’re upset about is losing their control. Pre-internet, those interested in being entertained were forced to comply with their strict business model, as to where, when, and how people can see their entertainment. The internet took some of that control away, and they’re pissed about it…so they make up all this bullplop about being paupers and people losing jobs in an attempt to get the mindless drones to give them their unquestioned control back.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Read all of TucsonSentinel.com's
coronavirus reporting here »

Click image to enlarge

Center for American Progress Fund

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid