From the archive: This story is more than 10 years old.
Comments on #Occupy
Just how much can the state restrict a peaceful protest?
Posted Oct 17, 2011
Braden Goyette ProPublica
If the First Amendment guarantees the right to peaceable assembly, why do peaceful protesters keep getting arrested — and sometimes pepper-sprayed and beaten up? We take a closer look at the laws governing protests and how the government can limit them.
I’m sure there are local maximum occupancy restrictions enforcible by the fire department, just like in bars, including littering. The owners can be fined and the property can be condemmed if it is a threat to public safety after appropriate warnings. I’m sure the peacable assembly clause does not include overnight siege, so anyone staying on the property overnight should need to have written permission from the owners, just like a lease. If they start buiding a wooden horse they should be evicted from the cities.
Their right to make asses out of themselves ends with my right to live my life. I don’t care if these bums want to protest over nothing, but when they start getting in the way of me driving home or walking where I need to go…then I have a problem and I expect something to be done.
I could come a lot closer to sympathizing with their cause…if they would find a way to clearly articulate what the hell that is.
Bret, if you’d read some other news sources, you’d see the protest is mainly about corporate greed but is really about how the whole system is broken. I think Danny Glover put it well earlier today:
“Young and old, young and old, it’s not only taking back our democracy. We have to remake it. We have to transform it. We have to build something better than that. That’s what we have to do. It’s let us down. It’s failed us. It’s failed us in our homes. It’s failed us in our communities. It’s failed us state by state. But it’s also failed this fragile planet we live on, this fragile Mother Earth, which nourishes us. It’s failed us, too. We are on the basis of—we’re on the basis, right on the precipice of ecological collapse. And yet, it goes on. It talks about growth and development and growth and growth and making more money, transforming the commonplace into private property and private wealth. It keeps doing that. But we have to change that. And we have to be here tomorrow, the next day, the day after tomorrow and the tomorrows after tomorrow, and not only to change it, but to ensure that its transformation is institutionalized. Just as the transformation into a country controlled by corporations has been institutionalized, we have to take it back and transform it into one that is for the people, by the people, that works on behalf of the people, and works on behalf of the planet.”
Scar, you make my point for me…all they’re doing is complaining. They’re not offering any alternatives. For any cause to be successful, it needs to things this “Occupy” thing is lacking…clearly identified objectives. Where do you want to go? How are you going to get there? They’ve done a very half-assed job with the first, and they haven’t even touched the second as far as I can see.
I’m forced to wonder how many of these people angry with Wall Street voted to reelect Congresspeople who voted to bail out Wall Street back in ‘08 and ‘09…you know, like Giffords and Grijalva.
I’m wondering how many of them buy foreign-made products when there are American-made products available…like cars for example.
I wonder how many of them shop at Wal-Mart.
I wonder how many of them bought a computer without bothering to research if they called for support for that computer what country their call would be routed to.
Economic imbalance? I’m wondering how many of these people are bitching about problems that they themselves helped to create.
Yes, all the things you mention are an unavoidable part of current life. I think what we’re seeing is a re-inventing of our democracy from the grass roots.
No. As i said these people are not the cause. The main cause is corporate greed and a system that supports that. Show me a voting system that is transparent where the public can verify: who can vote, who did vote, chain of custody, and the count. Show me an American car with no foreign parts in it. Show me how a poor person can survive without using Wal-mart. Currently impossible.
So, you want others to do your thinking for you, and you want others to do your work for you, too. Yeah, guys like you are definitely the root cause of the problem you complain about.
You guys are complaining of symptoms. The problems are what you see in the mirror.
Bret, i was asking for your answers and I’m not impressed with your assumptions about me nor what they bring to the discussion. I’m leaving the conversation
I was watching YouTube videos about the Flea Party. I saw that Grijalva made an appearance at the Flea Party assembly (and promptly left once he saw it wasn’t catered). But, anyway, Grijalva was warmly received. Grijalva is one of the idiots who voted for corporate bailouts a couple of years ago. Isn’t that one of the things that the Flea Party is “protesting”?
Just another in the long list of examples how these idiots are making zero sense.
I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!
We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.
Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:
Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:
TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.
User Guidelines
Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.
We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.
We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.
Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.
Keep in mind:
A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
Ask questions. Search out answers.
Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.
TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:
Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.
Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.
Flagging
Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.
Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.
What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.
We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.
We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.
10 comments on this story
I’m sure there are local maximum occupancy restrictions enforcible by the fire department, just like in bars, including littering. The owners can be fined and the property can be condemmed if it is a threat to public safety after appropriate warnings. I’m sure the peacable assembly clause does not include overnight siege, so anyone staying on the property overnight should need to have written permission from the owners, just like a lease. If they start buiding a wooden horse they should be evicted from the cities.
Their right to make asses out of themselves ends with my right to live my life. I don’t care if these bums want to protest over nothing, but when they start getting in the way of me driving home or walking where I need to go…then I have a problem and I expect something to be done.
I could come a lot closer to sympathizing with their cause…if they would find a way to clearly articulate what the hell that is.
Bret, if you’d read some other news sources, you’d see the protest is mainly about corporate greed but is really about how the whole system is broken. I think Danny Glover put it well earlier today:
“Young and old, young and old, it’s not only taking back our democracy. We have to remake it. We have to transform it. We have to build something better than that. That’s what we have to do. It’s let us down. It’s failed us. It’s failed us in our homes. It’s failed us in our communities. It’s failed us state by state. But it’s also failed this fragile planet we live on, this fragile Mother Earth, which nourishes us. It’s failed us, too. We are on the basis of—we’re on the basis, right on the precipice of ecological collapse. And yet, it goes on. It talks about growth and development and growth and growth and making more money, transforming the commonplace into private property and private wealth. It keeps doing that. But we have to change that. And we have to be here tomorrow, the next day, the day after tomorrow and the tomorrows after tomorrow, and not only to change it, but to ensure that its transformation is institutionalized. Just as the transformation into a country controlled by corporations has been institutionalized, we have to take it back and transform it into one that is for the people, by the people, that works on behalf of the people, and works on behalf of the planet.”
Scar, you make my point for me…all they’re doing is complaining. They’re not offering any alternatives. For any cause to be successful, it needs to things this “Occupy” thing is lacking…clearly identified objectives. Where do you want to go? How are you going to get there? They’ve done a very half-assed job with the first, and they haven’t even touched the second as far as I can see.
I’m forced to wonder how many of these people angry with Wall Street voted to reelect Congresspeople who voted to bail out Wall Street back in ‘08 and ‘09…you know, like Giffords and Grijalva.
I’m wondering how many of them buy foreign-made products when there are American-made products available…like cars for example.
I wonder how many of them shop at Wal-Mart.
I wonder how many of them bought a computer without bothering to research if they called for support for that computer what country their call would be routed to.
Economic imbalance? I’m wondering how many of these people are bitching about problems that they themselves helped to create.
Yes, all the things you mention are an unavoidable part of current life. I think what we’re seeing is a re-inventing of our democracy from the grass roots.
@scar
Unavoidable? Are you kidding me? Wow…if that’s what you think, you definitely are part of the problem that you’re complaining about!
No. As i said these people are not the cause. The main cause is corporate greed and a system that supports that. Show me a voting system that is transparent where the public can verify: who can vote, who did vote, chain of custody, and the count. Show me an American car with no foreign parts in it. Show me how a poor person can survive without using Wal-mart. Currently impossible.
@scar
So, you want others to do your thinking for you, and you want others to do your work for you, too. Yeah, guys like you are definitely the root cause of the problem you complain about.
You guys are complaining of symptoms. The problems are what you see in the mirror.
Bret, i was asking for your answers and I’m not impressed with your assumptions about me nor what they bring to the discussion. I’m leaving the conversation
So, I’ll comment here…
I was watching YouTube videos about the Flea Party. I saw that Grijalva made an appearance at the Flea Party assembly (and promptly left once he saw it wasn’t catered). But, anyway, Grijalva was warmly received. Grijalva is one of the idiots who voted for corporate bailouts a couple of years ago. Isn’t that one of the things that the Flea Party is “protesting”?
Just another in the long list of examples how these idiots are making zero sense.