Sponsored by

Comments on

Marco Rubio: Immigration reform bill almost 'ready to go'

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio said on Sunday that 95 percent of the comprehensive immigration reform bill is "ready to go" but he is still pushing for more border security measures. Rubio dismissed concerns from conservative critics that he's been too soft on immigration and was manipulated by Democrats in the group steering the legislation.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

1
179 comments
Jun 16, 2013, 5:15 pm
-1 +0

SEN.GRAHAM! AT LEAST CONSERVATIVES HAVE PRINCIPLES, UNLIKE THIS ADMINISTRATION THAT HAS TRODDEN THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW INTO THE MUD.

PANDERING TO ILLEGAL ALIENS AND SPECIAL INTERESTS, WILL BE INSTANTLY REMEMBERED, WHEN IT’S TIME FOR REELECTION.

Without secure enforcement at the southern border fence, the American People will not endorse any form of immigration reform. They have been deviously been promised before by some of the most powerful politicians, going back to 1986. The American People do not trust any political party Government, as we have been lied to so many times. The corruption has spread like a toxic mold through these administrations chambers, from representatives of the special interest lobby that converge on offices, concealed and be aware of “Greeks bearing gifts”.  The promised double layer fence stretching 700 miles was condemned to die, by one amendment introduced by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson.  This time there must be no mistake that if any kind of immigration reform is to be enacted, the designs of the 2006 Secure Fence must be installed, BEFORE any illegal alien can claim a right to receive legal status.

THOSE TWO FENCES MUST GO UP.

A conceited and insolent civil servant as Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano must have no say in when the first 350 miles of parallel fencing is completed, that will be a token of proof to the nation’s populace? AND that ONLY the full Congress can approve that this project is accomplished? Only when this construction is observed and approved by Congress should any illegal alien. As U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) stated “I know it’s hard to do, but I refuse to accept the idea that the most power country in the world — the country that put a man on the moon — is incapable of securing our border.”  We even assisted Israel to build a sturdy barrier in keep out murderous terrorists, who attack them all the time.

2
179 comments
Jun 16, 2013, 5:17 pm
-0 +0

Sens. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) have said the bill is comparable to the last immigration reform measure in 1986 because it “legalizes first and enforces later.” It was a catastrophe for working Americans who at this current time to some extent are still in competition with 3to 5 million who claimed legal status in 1986.  With the inception of the Senate bill S.477 11 million or even considerably more will be plying for work. Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn includes in his immigration overhaul, a biometric entry/exit system to prevent visa overstays that tend to be 45 percent of illegal immigrants. To me it makes absolute sense that anybody who overstays an expired visa, unless there are mitigating circumstances and as with illegal migrants crossing the border, should be prosecuted with a felony. That will dampen anybodies enthusiasm to come here without a visa, but then you must ask yourself why this case isn’t?

It’s obvious to me that the politicians are in the deep pockets of Special Interests, who had more say that if you want large donations for your reelection or more such as suspicious brown bag payments. A large majority of lawmakers in Washington or the state assemblies are corrupt and pay no attention to the wants of the American people. That is easily illustrated by the underhand programs that are passed on to illegal aliens and not to hurting Americans. Through quasi citizenship children that are dragged into America thus supplementing an “under the table” wages of those illegal aliens living in shadows; brought upon themselves by the magnet of jobs advocated by innocuous employers to enhance profits. That proofs to me that of our borders, airports and other entry ports had deliberate loopholes to undermine vital enforcement. It’s about time that a mandated E-Verify system is made fully operational, as employers have taken advantage for decades of foreigners and now they will have no choice but to authenticate the workers.

MY THOUGHTS ON E-VERIFY IS WHY NOT GO THE WHOLE WAY, AND ISSUE A NATIONAL BIOMETRIC ID CARD? WITH THE INNOVATIONS TODAY IT COULD BE A COUNTERFEIT PROOF ID AND AS A PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION, COULD BE A 100 PERCENT SAFE.  IT WOULD BE STATE OF THE ART DIGITAL SOCIAL SECURITY CARD THAT COULD PROVE WHO YOU ARE IN AN INSTANT WHEN SWIPING IT? HOOKED UP TO A NATIONAL DATA BASE, ITS IMMEDIATE ADVANTAGE IS HIRING YOU FOR A JOB, NOT AN UNAUTHORIZED WORKER. AS FURTHER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY TOOL, IT COULD BE USED FOR VOTING AND GUARANTEES AGAINST CREDIT CARD THEFT, WHICH CAUSES TERRIBLE BUREAUCRATIC CHAOS FOR THE VICTIM.

3
179 comments
Jun 16, 2013, 5:21 pm
-1 +0

SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM IS PROBABLY RIGHT ABOUT LOSING IN FUTURE ELECTIONS,, BUT ONLY BECAUSE UNKNOWN NUMBERS OF NON-CITIZENS VOTED ILLEGALLY IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, SOTHATS WHY HONEST AMERICANS NEED TO DEMAND A NATIONAL ID CARD?

Has any taxpayers ever thought that the reason citizens and legal residents births are down, is that they cannot afford the expense. While female migrants and immigrants and low income, give phony information to the hospital authorities and receive pre and post natal care for free, plus all the other welfare programs. Citizens and legal residents cannot normally follow this route, as they are expected to proffer a Social Security card, drivers license and other identification and then are haunted by debt collectors and attorneys to pay up.

They’re not going to slip anything past American People as in 1986.  Although with the Senate advancing the Gang of Eight immigration bill to the floor we’ve got serious work to do? New York Senator Chuck Schumer thinks “Illegal immigration will be a thing of the past!” His bill is going to solve it all? Well, I’ve got news Schumer: No, it’s not. By dismissing the majority of the major TRIGGERS, S.477 is worse than law signed into action 27 years ago. Folks we need to slam DC with a “NO AMNESTY FOR ILLEGALS! DOWN WITH THIS DE FACTO AMNESTY BILL!” Contact by phone Senators and the House Representatives, either State or Federal at toll-free—1-888-978-3094or you may phone the United States Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121. A terminal operator will connect you directly with the Senate office or just about anybody in Congress you request. A few well-meaning Senators who can be trusted are Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Sen. Coats and a few more, who are heading the list that are fighting for American sovereignty and our rights. ITS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT THAT EVERYBODY INTERESTED IN THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM OR A DE FACTO AMNESTY, ALL CITIZENS AND PERMANENT RESIDENTS SHOULD READ THE REPORTS IN JUDICIAL WATCH WEB SITE.


33 million new illegals on our backs, digging into welfare, food stamps and social security as they overrun our schools, hospitals and jails will be a death sentence to America. Our borders need to be locked down tightdespite Sen. Schumer dismissing border security as “not pressing.” He ought to be thrown out.

NO COPYRIGHT! PASS ALONG.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Senator Marco Rubio of Florida speaking in March at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland.

Categories

news, politics & government, border, business, crime & safety, family/life, local, arizona, nation/world, breaking, mexico/latin america, GlobalPost
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1767
  • Dylan Smith: 553
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • EllieMae: 193
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$15/mo. Printer's Devil
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Trusted Source
$1,000 Copy Desk Chief
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Printer's Devil
$50 Cub reporter
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sponsored by

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

Sponsored by
find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by