Sponsored by

Comments on

Report: Tough laws don’t make illegal immigrants ‘self-deport’

Strong family ties, the cost of returning to their native countries and fewer economic opportunities back home have kept illegal immigrants in the U.S., despite strict immigration laws here, a new report claims. The report said tough laws like Arizona’s SB 1070 do not prompt illegal immigrants to “self-deport.”... Read more»

have your say   

5 comments on this story

1
1770 comments
Feb 23, 2012, 10:07 am
-0 +0

I am sick to death of all the smear and spin of SB1070 being referred to as an “immigration law” when it’s just now. The Sentinel promises us news without spin. And, in most cases, they fulfill that promise. But the Sentinel really has to stop republishing this crap that incorrectly identifies SB1070 as an “immigration law”.

That said, I am a strong advocate of SB1070 and similar laws. However, I’ve known from the start that laws like SB1070 don’t cause anyone to self-deport. If a border jumper is going to disrespect our country, our laws, and our sovereignty, then one more state law isn’t gonna make a damn bit of difference to someone of such low character.

2
556 comments
Feb 23, 2012, 12:10 pm
-0 +1

@Bret Linden

This report isn’t solely about SB1070, but about the entire gamut of laws and regulations that cover both legal and illegal immigrants, and their effect on the population.

The legislative purpose of SB 1070 was to cause people to self-deport:

“The legislature declares that the intent of this act is to make attrition through enforcement the public policy of all state and local government agencies in Arizona. The provisions of this act are intended to work together to discourage and deter the unlawful entry and presence of aliens and economic activity by persons unlawfully present in the United States.”

3
1770 comments
Feb 23, 2012, 12:13 pm
-2 +0

...and said that laws like SB 1070, Arizona’s omnibus immigration law, make policing more difficult.

Not only was it called an “immigration law”, but the adjective “omnibus” was thrown in. It wasn’t quoting someone, and this isn’t in the opinion section.

The prosecution rests.

4
88 comments
Feb 23, 2012, 2:22 pm
-1 +4

I don’t believe that SB1070 is an immigration law, because it doesn’t address how someone would legally immigrate to the great nation of Arizona.  It is not a national law, and because only national law covers immigration, it simply cannot be an immigration law.  Although the additional title could be cause for some confusion.  ARTICLE 8.  ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS. Other people may think that it is an immigration law because it affects immigrants by requiring documentation.  I can understand that.

It certainly fits within the definition of omnibus, because it is all over the place discussing traffic violations to employer rules.

Now, is it good law?  Well, no. It is not, because it doesn’t build upon a working relationship with the entity that is responsible for immigration.  The fact that that entity doesn’t want to enforce the law in the same way that people in Arizona do means that this law is unenforceable, which makes it bad law.  Bad law causes turmoil and wasted resources, which is not an effective way of achieving a goal.

So, do we roll over?  No, but making bad law is a stupid political grandstanding waste of time.  We may not like the feds, be unless we decide to become Arizonastan, we need to work with them.

5
1770 comments
Feb 23, 2012, 2:28 pm
-2 +4

@janamg

cooperation is a two-way street. I think the feds have made it very clear that they’re not willing to do their part. They’ve beefed up the border a little bit, but by their own admission they’re not worried about the ones already here.

If someone spray-painted graffiti on your house, do you just let it sit there? Do you say to yourself “I didn’t put it there, so I’m not going to clean it up and it can just stay there”? Do you worry about offending the tagger that vandalized your house? Applying your logic to this analogy, it appears as if you would. But, I wouldn’t.

We have a mess here, and it needs to be cleaned up. It’s on the feds to clean it up, sure. But if they won’t clean it up, then we’re left with a choice to either let the mess just stay there or clean it up ourselves. I prefer the latter.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

According to this chart from the Pew Hispanic Center, almost half of illegal immigrants live with a child, compared to less than a third of native-born U.S. citizens.

Categories

news, politics & government, border, business, crime & safety, family/life, local, arizona, nation/world, breaking, Cronkite News, mexico/latin america
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1767
  • Dylan Smith: 554
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • EllieMae: 197
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$15/mo. Printer's Devil
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Trusted Source
$1,000 Copy Desk Chief
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Printer's Devil
$50 Cub reporter
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sponsored by

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

Sponsored by
find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by