Now Reading
Barber sues to add more ballots to CD 2 vote count

From the archive: This story is more than 5 years old.

Barber sues to add more ballots to CD 2 vote count

  • Voter Lea Goodwine-Cesarac and Barber campaign attorney Kevin Hamilton tell reporters Monday morning about why they are asking for ballots to be added to the CD 2 vote count.
    Dylan Smith/TucsonSentinel.comVoter Lea Goodwine-Cesarac and Barber campaign attorney Kevin Hamilton tell reporters Monday morning about why they are asking for ballots to be added to the CD 2 vote count.
  • Barber on election night.
    Dylan Smith/TucsonSentinel.comBarber on election night.

Attorneys for U.S. Rep. Ron Barber filed a lawsuit in federal court Monday morning, alleging that ballots in Arizona's CD 2 congressional race were improperly rejected. Last week, Barber asked county and state officials to delay the canvass of the election and include more votes. The Democrat trails Republican challenger Martha McSally by just 161 votes, and has said that up to 167 ballots were improperly rejected.

Saying that "the need for relief is urgent," the 266-page suit asks that 133 ballots in Pima and Cochise counties be added to the count.

If the suit is successful, Barber would still trail by 28 votes — with McSally having the possibility of pressing to have rejected ballots cast by Republican voters also added to the tally.

Three voters — Josh Cohen, Lauren Breckenridge, and Lea Goodwine-Cesarac — joined Barber in pressing the suit, which says the "plaintiffs have no other means of ensuring that their votes—and the lawfully cast votes of all Arizona citizens—are counted."

"I'm 81 years old, and in all my years, I never thought my vote would be tossed in the trash instead of counted," said one of those voters, Lea Goodwine-Cesarac, in a news release from the Barber campaign.

"We're not asking for special treatment, we're asking for our voice to be heard," she told reporters at a news conference Monday morning.

"We are talking about 133 Southern Arizona voters who lived up to their responsibility – they registered to vote and then showed up to vote," said Kevin Hamilton, Barber's campaign attorney. "We are asking the court to ensure that every lawful vote is counted."

Hamilton said that some of the 167 ballots pointed to by the campaign last week had been already included in the vote tally, but said he couldn't provide a number regarding those ballots.

"No election is perfect ... we rely on volunteers," he told reporters. "Sometimes they makes mistakes."

Officials have "chosen to ignore errors" made in the vote count, Hamilton said.

The attorney sidestepped questions about why Barber is pressing the issue if there aren't enough uncounted ballots to overcome McSally's lead.

The suit is "not about the horse race. It's not about winners and losers" but about counting all of the votes, he said.

The Barber campaign has pointed to differing deadlines for the review of various ballots in Cochise and Pima counties, saying that equal protection under the U.S. Constitution should require more ballots to be counted.

Many of the ballots pointed to by Barber were cast by voters who went to the wrong polling place or did not sign an affidavit for a provisional ballot.

Barber's campaign asked the court to set a hearing on the suit for Tuesday.

Under Arizona law, the narrow margin in the election will trigger an automatic recount next month. Hamilton said that the campaign has continued to hear from voters who are concerned that their votes were not counted.

McSally's campaign did not respond to requests for comment. Her election lawyers have been requesting thousands of pages of public records related to the vote count.

After both Pima and Cochise counties declined Barber's requests to review more ballots last week, his attorneys wrote to Secretary of State Ken Bennett, asking him to delay the statewide election canvass.

In a letter Friday, Barber's team said that there were 147 ballots improperly rejected from the count in Pima County, and 20 such ballots in Cochise County.

"There is no dispute that these voters were properly registered to vote and were fully qualified to do so as Arizona citizens, yet their ballots remain uncounted," wrote Hamilton.

"Both counties refused to consider or even address these issues, notwithstanding the sworn declarations before them demonstrating innumerable instances of clear poll worker error," wrote the Barber campaign lawyer.

While McSally hasn't made any public comment on the issue, her campaign has asked for thousands of public records, including precinct registers of Pima County voters. Barber's campaign has also requested stacks of documents.

Thursday, Cochise County joined a move by Pima County earlier in the week, rejecting a request by Barber to delay a vote to approve the canvass of the election, a move that would give the Democrat more time to make a case for adding some rejected ballots to the count.

Attorneys for the congressman had asked the Cochise County Board of Supervisors to put off the canvass, providing signed declarations by nine voters who said their ballots had been rejected improperly.

Arizona's 2nd Congressional District covers Cochise and about half of Pima County residents. Because of the narrow margin, an automatic recount will be held next month.

Tuesday, the Pima County Board of Supervisors rejected a similar request to delay the official approval of the count. Barber's campaign said then there were 132 Pima voters in the district whose ballots were improperly tossed out.

In Cochise, the campaign said voters had their ballots rejected because they cast provisional ballots at the wrong locations. One was told by officials that her signature did not match the one on file, attorneys said.

Another 11 voters had their early ballots rejected because they did not sign the affidavit. "There is no rational basis for permitting ballots to be cured where a signature-mismatch determination has been made but not where a ballot is unsigned," Barber's attorneys told supervisors.

In Pima, the Barber campaign on Thursday added 15 affidavits to the 132 sent to supervisors earlier in the week, and said that the county should count those ballots and amend the certified vote count to include them.

McSally has not commented on the issue this week, but issued a call for volunteers Sunday night to assist the campaign on Monday and Tuesday. The Republican was in Washington, D.C., last week, attending orientation sessions for freshman members of Congress, as she did two years ago when she narrowly lost to Barber.

Tuesday, her lawyers argued before the Pima board that the supervisors didn't have the authority to delay the canvass. Under Arizona law, the canvass may be delayed if valid ballots are missing from the count.

Barber's lawyers pointed out to supervisors votes that they maintain should be counted, but did not raise the issue of a general election ballot that has apparently gone missing from a batch found mixed with Continental School District votes late last week.

Last week, McSally's lawyers went to court in an attempt to halt the counting of some ballots, but a judge denied the move.

In a letter to the Pima supes on Tuesday, Barber said that errors by poll workers led to voters casting ballots at the wrong locations, while others were mistakenly tossed out because signatures didn't match.

Far from conceding the race, Barber's campaign has stopped short of saying that they'll file a suit to challenge the vote count, but said they'll continue to ask state and local officials to include more ballots in the count.

"Just because mistakes get made, doesn't mean voters get disenfranchised," said an attorney for the incumbent Democrat.

The canvassing process is designed to spot and correct errors, "and ensure the final certified results are correct," said Kevin Hamilton, from the Perkins Coie law firm.

"The system broke down here," with voters not directed to the correct polling locations. "This is not a failure of the voters, but a failure of the poll workers," he told reporters Tuesday.

In Pima County, 776 ballots were rejected for various reasons, with nearly half — 371 — rejected because registered voters went to the wrong polling place, County Recorder F. Ann Rodriguez said last week.

Because the 2nd Congressional District covers only part of Pima County, not all of those ballots are relevant to the Barber-McSally race.

Along with the letter, affidavits from 132 voters were sent to the supervisors, describing why they believe their votes should be counted.

Among them were Sita Adhikari, who became a U.S. citizen in 2013 and was casting a ballot in her first election. Her vote was discarded because she cast a provisional ballot in the wrong polling place. Adhikari said that poll workers did not direct her to the correct polling location, as they are required to do.

Also told that her ballot was not counted was Roma Page, who was born in 1919 and been registered to vote since she was 21 years old, Barber's campaign said. Page, an Arizona resident since 1985, had her ballot rejected because her signature on an early ballot did not match the one on her registration card.

"Like many older voters, her signature has changed with age. She called the Pima County Recorder's Office to ensure that her ballot was counted, but they neither returned her call, or counted her ballot," Barber's lawyers said.

The Barber campaign's letter to the supervisors pointed to two married couples — all were registered to vote, but both wives had their ballots discarded. One couple were incorrectly told their names were not on the voter lists. The husband pointed out his name and voted a regular ballot, while the wife voted a provisional ballot that was not counted. Another couple who had recently moved were told their names were not on the rolls; the husband's provisional ballot was counted while the wife's was not.

Another voter spoiled his original ballot, and was not given a replacement regular ballot as required, but rather a provisional one — that was not counted, Barber's campaign said.

Hamilton wouldn't say whether Barber was preparing to sue to have more ballots included in the count; the campaign is taking the issue "one step at a time," he told reporters Tuesday.

"Arizona law has multiple levels," he said.

"The process isn't done," he said, with the campaign still receiving calls from voters concerned that their ballots weren't counted.

The unofficial totals in CD 2 are 109,704 for the Republican challenger, and 109,543 for the Democratic incumbent.

Arizona's first-ever recount in a congressional race will be mandated because the difference between the candidates is 200 votes or less.

— 30 —

Best in Internet Exploder