Bill would curtail superintendent’s power over ed board
The Senate Education Committee advanced a bill Thursday that would remove the superintendent of public instruction from the role of overseeing the State Board of Education’s staff.
Contained in an amendment to a bill that would expand the Board of Education, the proposal would strike provisions of state law specifying that the board employs staff on the recommendation of the superintendent and that the superintendent directs the work of board employees.
Sen. Kelli Ward, R-Lake Havasu City, the committee’s chairwoman, offered the amendment two weeks after Superintendent of Public Instruction Diane Douglas and Gov. Doug Ducey sparred over Douglas’ decision to fire the Board of Education’s executive director and assistant executive director. When Ducey said Douglas lacked the authority to fire the employees, Douglas fired off an acid response and said she wanted the Legislature to clarify her role.
If HB 2184 becomes law, that clarification would reduce Douglas' role to the point that she no longer approving claims for board members’ travel expenses.
It would change language on her role with the board from “executive officer of the State Board of Education” to “executive officer responsible for the execution of policies of the State Board of Education.”
While Douglas has said she should have authority over board staff, she told the committee she supports the bill because it would prevent costly legal action.
“Lawsuits divert money from the classroom while many resolve issues otherwise unresolvable,” she said. “That’s not the case in this instance. That is why I sought a legislative solution rather than a legal solution.”
The committee unanimously advanced the bill, authored by Rep. Paul Boyer, R-Phoenix, which also would expand the board from nine to 11 members to include the owner or administrator of a charter school and an additional lay person.
Several people registered their objections to Ward’s amendment, saying it would strip an elected official of the power to oversee education in Arizona.
Beth Hallgren, a state committeewoman in Pinal County, said the current friction between Douglas and the Board of Education keeps everyone involved from having best interests of parents and children in mind.
“By allowing this to take place, the State Board of Education does not answer to the voters they are supposed to serve: the parents and the children,” she said.
Clair Van Steenwyk, a Republican who has run unsuccessfully for the U.S. House, U.S. Senate and state House, said that by acquiescing to the bill’s provisions, Douglas is joining lawmakers and the Board of Education in failing to look after the interests of voters.
“Now, quite frankly, from my perspective, she is now circumventing the will of the people as well by surrendering her authority to these bureaucrats, lobbyists and political ladder-climbers,” he said. “That’s the problem.”
Ward said after the hearing that her amendment doesn’t take too much power away from the superintendent of public instruction.
“It basically just sets out in more clear language what’s going on,” she said. “The state school board currently is the policy-setting entity for education in Arizona. The superintendent has always been the executive officer who carries out that policy.