From the archive: This story is more than 10 years old.
Comments on CD8
Poll: Barber has strong lead in CD8
Voters have overwhelming negative view of Kelly
Posted Jun 11, 2012
Dylan Smith TucsonSentinel.com
A poll released Monday said Democrat Ron Barber "appears to have the race pretty much locked up" as voters give him a 53-41 edge over Republican Jesse Kelly. Voters overwhelmingly—59 percent— have a negative opinion of Kelly, while 54 percent view Barber favorably.
Well of course Barber is going to win. We knew that all along. Tucson is filled with brain-dead voters that refuse to do their own research and their own thinking. Giffords scared voters into voting for her back in ‘10, and Barber cloned the same unethical-but winning-strategy. Why mess with a good thing, right?
If the voters around here actually thought for themselves, they would see the things that Kelly was actually saying about the long-term solvency of Social Security and Medicare and about how the younger generation should be offered choices. They would see that Kelly is right. But, hey, why burden yourself with thinking when Barber will do it for you, right?
It has been quite some time since any district in Tucson has had a congressperson they could be proud of (if they were paying any attention that is). It’s a crying shame that we’re probably going to have to continue to wait for that.
I have an overwhelmingly negative view of Barber. The guy has based his entire campaign on smearing Kelly and lying to voters instead of talking about himself and what he wants to accomplish. On the rare occasions he doesn’t talk about Kelly, all he does is speak in generalities “protecting the middle class”? What does that mean? Protect them from what? How are you going to protect them?
And he’s so desperate at this point he’s pulling out Giffords as a prop. An ethical person would let the poor woman rest and recover…but no, not Barber. “Hey, Giffords got a lot of sympathy when the mass media was publishing stories ad nauseum about her daily until they finally got sick of it. But let’s see if she has just a few more miles on her…” Absolutely disgusting. What’s even more sickening is Barber using the “hero of nothing” quote even more out of context as Kelly’s Social Security sound bytes.
This guy is a scumbag. He needs a good ass-beating, not a job in Congress. I hope CD8 does the right thing tomorrow, but the Tucson electorate has a very poor track record for doing the right thing.
Come Wednesday, will John Ellinwood be looking for work as a pollster? Sounds as though he’s got some ideas on how the business should work. Hahahaha!!!
I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!
We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.
Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:
Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:
TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.
User Guidelines
Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.
We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.
We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.
Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.
Keep in mind:
A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
Ask questions. Search out answers.
Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.
TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:
Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.
Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.
Flagging
Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.
Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.
What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.
We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.
We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.
3 comments on this story
Well of course Barber is going to win. We knew that all along. Tucson is filled with brain-dead voters that refuse to do their own research and their own thinking. Giffords scared voters into voting for her back in ‘10, and Barber cloned the same unethical-but winning-strategy. Why mess with a good thing, right?
If the voters around here actually thought for themselves, they would see the things that Kelly was actually saying about the long-term solvency of Social Security and Medicare and about how the younger generation should be offered choices. They would see that Kelly is right. But, hey, why burden yourself with thinking when Barber will do it for you, right?
It has been quite some time since any district in Tucson has had a congressperson they could be proud of (if they were paying any attention that is). It’s a crying shame that we’re probably going to have to continue to wait for that.
OK another comment…
I have an overwhelmingly negative view of Barber. The guy has based his entire campaign on smearing Kelly and lying to voters instead of talking about himself and what he wants to accomplish. On the rare occasions he doesn’t talk about Kelly, all he does is speak in generalities “protecting the middle class”? What does that mean? Protect them from what? How are you going to protect them?
And he’s so desperate at this point he’s pulling out Giffords as a prop. An ethical person would let the poor woman rest and recover…but no, not Barber. “Hey, Giffords got a lot of sympathy when the mass media was publishing stories ad nauseum about her daily until they finally got sick of it. But let’s see if she has just a few more miles on her…” Absolutely disgusting. What’s even more sickening is Barber using the “hero of nothing” quote even more out of context as Kelly’s Social Security sound bytes.
This guy is a scumbag. He needs a good ass-beating, not a job in Congress. I hope CD8 does the right thing tomorrow, but the Tucson electorate has a very poor track record for doing the right thing.
Come Wednesday, will John Ellinwood be looking for work as a pollster? Sounds as though he’s got some ideas on how the business should work. Hahahaha!!!