Sponsored by

Comments on

Photos: Nogales border vigil

Friday night, a newly formed group of activists began a 48-hour vigil and fast in Nogales to call for justice for those killed or injured by U.S. Border Patrol agents, organizers said.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

May 23, 2014, 3:25 pm
-0 +0

TucsonSentinel.com’s original reporting and curation of border and immigration news is generously supported in part by a grant from the Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation.

While I appreciate the transparency and disclosure, it is clear that these grants are starting to have an influence into how these stories are spun. For example:

The group says it will be joined by family members of José Antonio Elena Rodriguez, the 16-year-old resident of Nogales, Sonora, who was shot by Border Patrol agents on Oct. 10, 2012. The family of Carlos Lamadrid, who was 19 when was shot and killed in Douglas in 2011…

What Mr. Ingram conveniently left out is why these two were shot and killed. These two were involved in throwing rocks at BP agents, who justifiably defended themselves from this potentially deadly attack (the latter was reportedly a drug mule).

Speaking as a taxpayer, since BP agents cost time and money to train, I don’t see them as disposable. I see them as resources that taxpayers have invested in and I want them defending themselves. Speaking as someone who lives in this region that hasn’t completely lost his mind, it just makes sense that BP agents, or anyone, should be allowed to defend themselves against bodily harm or worse.

Anyone who doesn’t think rocks are a deadly weapon wouldn’t have a problem standing still while I throw rocks and try to hit them in the head, right?

But, hey, never let facts get in the way of a good story, right Paul?

May 23, 2014, 3:56 pm
-0 +0


Beyond your contention that the brief account provided by BP in the Rodriguez killing is entirely accurate (and if it is, why won’t that agency release the video of the shooting?), you’re completely off-base in your allegation that our coverage of anything is slanted by our funders.

EEJF is one of the largest and most respected funders of nonprofit investigative journalism in the country. They focus on supporting the best journalism organizations in the nation and don’t have any political points to push. We’ve never had a single conversation on how to spin a story, had any direction from them regarding what we should report on, or even heard a peep of a suggestion that we should cover a story in a certain way — and that’s as it should be.

While we of course rely on news tips from our readers as well s their contributions, any of our supporters, large or small, who suggested that we cover any story with a slant would very quickly find their money handed back to them.

May 23, 2014, 4:02 pm
-1 +0

@Dylan Smith

The border stories as of late do appear to be written from one side of the issue. I really can’t see you arguing that. You gotta admit that is true. This latest story which leaves out the details of why these guys were shot and killed only feeds that perception. Those details really should have been worked into that story, even if preceded by “BP contends they were shot because…”.

As to why videos aren’t released, what’s the point? We all know that the open-borders crowd, and also the types that are holding the vigil mention in this story, would only blind themselves to the truth and only twist, distort, and spin the video to be anything but what it actually is. Were I the king of BP or whatever that guy is I would have made the same decision in his place.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Paul M. Ingram/TucsonSentinel.com

Guadalupe Guerrero, left and Shena Gutierrez, far right, spoke to a crowd around 20 supporters asking for justice and accountability from U.S. Customs and Border Protection during a 48-hour vigil in Nogales, Ariz.


news, politics & government, border, family/life, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1767
  • Dylan Smith: 554
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • EllieMae: 197
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by


I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$15/mo. Printer's Devil
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Trusted Source
$1,000 Copy Desk Chief
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Printer's Devil
$50 Cub reporter
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.


Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sponsored by

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

Sponsored by
find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by