From the archive: This story is more than 5 years old.
Comments on
Phone logs connect Corp. Commissioner to campaigns, ‘dark money’ and APS
Posted May 20, 2015
Evan Wyloge Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting
Arizona Corporation Commissioner Bob Stump repeatedly communicated with the executive director of a “dark money” group that spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to help elect the candidates he backed, while also keeping regular contact with those candidates, their campaign manager, and a senior executive of the state’s largest utility, Arizona Public Service.
The headline would also be accurate stating “Corp. Commissioner Using Various Media to Connect with Constituents and Stakeholders”. It’s probably not a bad idea to get a look at the content in the logs but in genteral communication with those affected by your decisions is a good thing.
what planet do you live on Kyle…this man has a definite conflict of interest and I don’t see him getting into contact with myself who as a low income citizen of this state is affected by Mr Stump’s decisions also
I’m not saying he’s innocent but we complain about people in political office not being in tune with constituents and now that one of his constituents is contacting him and he’s responding you assume that the content of those messages are malevolent. Is is suspicious yes, but there is a chance he is being a good representative.
I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!
We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.
Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:
Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:
TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.
User Guidelines
Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.
We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.
We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.
Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.
Keep in mind:
A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
Ask questions. Search out answers.
Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.
TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:
Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.
Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.
Flagging
Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.
Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.
What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.
We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.
We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.
4 comments on this story
The headline would also be accurate stating “Corp. Commissioner Using Various Media to Connect with Constituents and Stakeholders”. It’s probably not a bad idea to get a look at the content in the logs but in genteral communication with those affected by your decisions is a good thing.
@Kyle V.
Stump’s free to release the actual contents of the text messages — which are public records under Arizona law.
what planet do you live on Kyle…this man has a definite conflict of interest and I don’t see him getting into contact with myself who as a low income citizen of this state is affected by Mr Stump’s decisions also
I’m not saying he’s innocent but we complain about people in political office not being in tune with constituents and now that one of his constituents is contacting him and he’s responding you assume that the content of those messages are malevolent. Is is suspicious yes, but there is a chance he is being a good representative.
Cactus Dave said:
Have you tried contacting Mr. Stump concerning a policy issue he’s responsible for? If not it’d be interesting to see if/how he responds.