Sponsored by

Comments on

PCC faculty call for Board to resign; Chancellor searches continue

Embattled PCC is looking for two chief executives at the same time: a (very) interim head to replace interim Chancellor Suzanne Miles, and a permanent leader, whom PCC officials hope to have in place by July 1. Meanwhile, the Faculty Senate is poised for a no-confidence vote in the college's Governing Board.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

Mar 28, 2013, 3:55 pm
-1 +2

Pima’s Staff Council, which represents non-faculty employees, is also poised to weigh in on the issues facing the college, but has yet to publicly release a statement.

Despite my hyper-asshole boss Jeff White’s idiotic claims to the contrary, I was a pretty popular guy at Northwest Campus. Hence, when I ran for Staff Council I was elected. (Did not finish my term, was transferred/promoted to East Campus before my term was up).

Staff council did have several concerned people who wanted to initiate positive change and do good for the college. Unfortunately, they were outnumbered by a bunch of PCC yes-men who didn’t want to rock the boat, and whose only reason for serving was to get out of work for two or three hours every month. Hence, it was impossible to get anything meaningful done, and I saw it as a complete waste of time. That’s why when I moved over to East I didn’t bother to submit my name for election. I was glad to be out of Staff Council.

Granted, I’ve been out of PCC for over three years now, and perhaps things have changed…but I don’t see that happening in the case of Staff Council. Of course, I hope I’m wrong on this one.

Mar 28, 2013, 4:07 pm
-0 +3

Miles announced earlier this month that she would step down as PCC’s chief executive to become president of the Community Campus.

Miles should be one of the first ones fired. Her “stepping down” is a near-meaningless gesture. The pay for a campus president isn’t all that far from the reduced-salary she decided to accept in the wake of the outrage over paying two chancellor salaries. I assure you, her household finances will be unaffected by this move.

Miles was number two for pretty much of Flores’ term, if not all of it. Her claims that “she didn’t know”...please. I’m glad the HLC called her out on that. If you’re number two for that long, and you’re saying you didn’t know what was going on, one of two things is true:

-you’re lying
-you’re so much of a stark-raving idiot that you’re clearly incapable of being number two and should have never been in that spot to begin with

Miles was/is a big part of the problem, and needs to go with the board (Dr. Lee excepted, of course).

Speaking of the board, perhaps they can explain why they’re clutching so tightly to these unpaid positions, even after being thoroughly disgraced as they have and being asked to resign by so many.

Mar 29, 2013, 4:22 pm
-0 +1

Miles is also out of the running for a community college job in Oregon.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Dylan Smith/TucsonSentinel.com

PCC Governing Board members Even, Cortez, Stewart, Lee and Longoria at Monday's special meeting.


news, politics & government, business, education, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1767
  • Dylan Smith: 554
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • EllieMae: 197
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by


I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$15/mo. Printer's Devil
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Trusted Source
$1,000 Copy Desk Chief
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Printer's Devil
$50 Cub reporter
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.


Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sponsored by

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

Sponsored by
find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by