- Radar van locations, traffic incidents & today's gas prices
- Live weather radar
- Police & fire scanners
- Report road hazards, graffiti & other issues
- Factchecking Carson on border apprehensions
- Americans must open arms to Syrian refugees8
- Subsidy express: Who gets a lift, and who does Sun Tran take for a ride?7
- Update: $4.3M Sun Tran deal: Up to $5/hr. raises for some workers3
- GOP Council candidates need to up fundraising ahead of looming deadline2
- Details show bus strike disaster was much ado about nothing2
Posted Feb 4, 2012, 11:28 am
Maybe the War on Stupid entered the mainstream last year when Chris Matthews began losing patience with silly campaign rhetoric and rolling his eyes. Lately, he has begun to call out the stupid-speak during interviews, an almost unheard of practice on cable news. And he’s not alone.
Over the years, people who call heads on stupid have taken a lot of guff. Critics complain even when the target is stupid ideas not stupid people. Apparently, the word makes people uncomfortable.
But whether it is calling health reform “socialized medicine,” blaming unionized workers for the failures of management, arguing that faith ideology should be taught in science classes, or blaming poor people for a sour economy, stupidity in politics is epidemic. In each case, the claim is made simply to demonize, distance or distract. The socialists, trade unionists, godless heathens and lazy leeches are something different from you and dangerous to you. Or so the ruse goes.
No recent example better embodies the use of stupidity than Rick Tyler, a Gingrich surrogate who sought to defend his candidate’s racist comments by repeating over and over that black people should vote for Republicans because“Democrats abort their babies.” Whatever you think of Democrats, you’d be hard pressed to give an example of them rounding up black women for abortions. Yet Tyler thought this was a good response to whether Gingrich was pandering to South Carolina racists.
The substantive question – is the candidate racist – is obscured by the ridiculous assertion that Democrats murder babies. See how it works?
To some degree, we only have ourselves to blame. During the 1960s we began to believe that every person had value, and this later morphed into a willingness to let people believe their superstitious, wild-assed guess had the same importance as well-reasoned analysis. And modern journalism – until recently – presented opposing views as equal, even if one were factual and one were entirely made up. Then Ronald Reagan told uneducated people they were actually smarter than college grads. “Intellectually elite” – something every World War II vet hoped his son or daughter would be – became a pejorative.
But now more mainstream pundits and pols have taken up our War on Stupidity. Last fall, Paul Begala wrote "The Stupid Party" for Newsweek. Among Begala’s points: “Today’s Republican Party is more the party of Sarah Palin’s defiant know-nothingness than the brainy conservatism of Bill Bennett. The GOP is a party of ideologues, not ideas.
“It’s about emotion and scapegoating and finger-pointing. And so even the smart Republicans – and I do believe most of the candidates in the GOP presidential field are intelligent – have to at least play dumb," Begala wrote.
Support TucsonSentinel.com today, because a smarter Tucson is a better Tucson.
Just a few weeks later, Tim Dickinson penned "The GOP’s Crackpot Agenda" for Rolling Stone. Dickenson’s long-form piece outlines (in excruciating detail) a GOP platform well to the right of most Americans. Along the way he quotes yesteryear’s farthest righter, televangelist Pat Robertson, “Those people in the Republican primary have got to lay off. They're forcing their leaders, the front-runners, into positions that will mean they lose the general election."
If you thought Crazy Pat was the only Republican who was worried, you’d be wrong. The most recent conservative to jump on the anti-stupidity bandwagon is syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker. While Parker doesn’t quite have a fully formed understanding of toxic stupidity – she still imagines Gingrich is smart – she does get the point.
Writing in "The Palinization of the Republican Party" she noted, “The big tent fashioned by Ronald Reagan has become bilious with the hot air of religious fervor. No one was more devout than the very-Catholic (William F.) Buckley, but you didn’t see him convening revivals in the public square. Nor is it likely he would have embraced fundamentalist views that increasingly have forced the party into a corner where science and religion can’t coexist.”
Lastly, In These Times contributor and University of Michigan professor, Susan J. Douglas, writes (in a piece called "It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid"), “Various commentators have resorted to the word ‘sideshow’ to characterize the truly bizarre parade of serial Republican front-runners who brandish their ignorance like Olympic medals and promote the most extremist, numbskull policies to be heard in years.” Douglas continued, “This election year’s mantra should not be, 'It’s the economy, stupid,' but, 'It’s the Republican Congress, stupid.' "
Begala summarized the fight, “As with everything in politics, know-nothingness will succeed until it doesn’t.” Finally the war on stupidity is gaining new (and influential) allies. So this may be the beginning of the end.
Bottom line? All ideas are not equal. Some are just dumb. So the next time you hear someone try to derail a substantive policy discussion with a ridiculously stupid idea, stand up and yell “Horseshit!” as loudly as you can.
Jimmy Zuma splits his time between Washington, D.C. and Tucson. He writes the online opinion journal, Smart v. Stupid. He spent 5 years in Tucson in the early ‘80s, when life was a little slower, swamp coolers were a little more plentiful, Tucson’s legendary music scene was in full bloom, and the prevailing work ethic was “don’t - unless you have to.”