Sponsored by

Comments on

Occupy Tucson: Open letter to Kozachik & Villaseñor

An open letter to Councilman Kozachik and TPD Chief Villaseñor, from organizer Shannon Cain: "We are Occupy Tucson, and this village isn't going anywhere."... Read more»

have your say   

22 comments on this story

 1 2 >
1
83 comments
Dec 26, 2011, 4:46 pm
-4 +5

Awesome Shannon!

2
172 comments
Dec 26, 2011, 7:32 pm
-4 +3

Excellent coverage and response Shannon.  Occupy USA, we are the 99%.

3
318 comments
Dec 26, 2011, 7:57 pm
-3 +3

dear Shannon get outta da park and stay outta da park, Shannon how dare you occupy anything.

4
1763 comments
Dec 26, 2011, 9:10 pm
-3 +6

the downtown crime rate was 20 percent lower as compared to the 46 days before Occupy Tucson established its encampments.

The Tucson Sentinel names Bret Linden the Sexiest Man Alive for 2011.

See, anyone can just pull something outta their ass and say anything to try to make a point. I want to see proof, a link to something on TPD’s website or something similar backing this statement up. I honestly don’t believe it. To me, it sounds as if the cases of attempted child molestation downtown went up by a significant margin…

With repeated stories of an average of something like 10 people cited every evening, when there weren’t 10 people cited before the flea party gathering, how in the world could there be a drop in crime? Yes, curfew violation does count as crime. So does vagrancy, public drunkenness, and child molestation.

And, in the unlikely event that this alleged 20% decrease is accurate, that could be anything. How about citing in what types of crimes? Maybe some went down while others went up? Maybe the crime rate went down because the flea party was a repellent to anyone else going downtown…

If you search on “Occupy Tucson”, amongst the videos you’ll find the one at the link below…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_UcRaLUX3U

The person in that video look familiar to you? It should…it’s YOU Shannon Cain. Right toward the beginning of the video, you say the following…

“We are increasingly outnumbered by people who are there for purposes of survival and not for activism.”

So, by your own admission, the flea party camp evolved into a camp where the homeless and addicts hang out (though I admit I can’t tell the difference between the two). Yet, you want the city to allow that idiocy to continue. Are you serious?

With each passing day and each passing story, the flea party’s credibility is “progressively” (pun intended) decreasing.

5
1763 comments
Dec 26, 2011, 9:20 pm
-5 +6

I want to add something else…

Any member of this “Occupy” thing has absolutely no right or basis to accuse anyone else of being vague, ambiguous, inconsistent, or evasive…the flea party has been doing that since October whenever someone asked them what the hell they were talking about.

6
5 comments
Dec 26, 2011, 10:21 pm
-4 +5

Before the eviction, Shannon Cain was one of the “Occupiers” who went home every night, took a hot bath, then sat sipping hot cocoa while she thought of brilliant prose to write about her comrades freezing their asses off in the park.
She is very, very full of herself.

Roy Warden

7
2 comments
Dec 26, 2011, 10:24 pm
-1 +5

Bret, you do seem a bit angry and unlikely to change your mind about anything, but just for the record:

  According to crimereports.com, the crime tracking service linked from TPD’s website, in the 46 days of the Occupation of Veinte de Agosto Park, there were 48 reported crimes ranging from burglary to aggravated assault in the downtown area (roughly 1-10 at the east to 5th Avenue at the west, and 13th Street at the south to Alameda at the north). In the 46-day period ending October 14, before Occupy established its encampment, 60 such crimes were reported.

8
1763 comments
Dec 27, 2011, 9:26 am
-3 +4

Typical liberal thinking…whenever a liberal is called out, the automatic knee-jerk response is one of five things…“hateful”, “uncivil”, “vitriolic” (that’s along Sheriff Dumbass…I mean Dupnik), “racist”, or, the one you chose…“angry”. Get a dictionary and read it…anger and calling someone out on inaccuracies have nothing to do with each other.

But, that said, I looked at the site you referenced…

I looked up that site, and punched in the dates for the flea party infestation. I’m seeing no references to curfew violations, attempted molestation (you Good Samaritans did inform the police, right?), drunkeness in public, disturbing the peace, or anything similar.

Well, we all know that all of those things were party of the flea party. If they’re not referenced there, then I seriously question the accuracy of the data provided.

Tell ya what…instead of going through a middleman web site, how about asking TPD directly? Villasenor has been FAR more cooperative and patient with the flea party then I would have been in his place. I’m sure he would be happy to provide you with the statistical data you request. And, if he provides data that the flea party infestation resulted in a 20% OVERALL drop in crime (I mean felonies AND misdemeanors), then I will come back here and apologize. However, I don’t think it’s going to come to that, is it Shannon?

9
1763 comments
Dec 27, 2011, 9:28 am
-3 +3

Oh, and another thing Shannon…I find it very interesting that you took the time to defend yourself against that I said, but not what Roy Warden said. Sure, Roy can be a crackpot, and is most of the time, but what he stated in this thread I don’t doubt in the slightest.

Since you did respond to me and not him I’m going to interpret that as you not contesting what he had to say about you. Which, in turn, makes me further question the dedication to your cause…whatever the hell that is.

10
83 comments
Dec 27, 2011, 9:37 am
-1 +2

Haha Bret you are so funny, thinking you accomplish something here…. oh well, good entertainment at least!

11
2 comments
Dec 27, 2011, 9:53 am
-3 +3

Actually, my mistake was feeding the troll. Ah well…live & learn.

12
1763 comments
Dec 27, 2011, 9:59 am
-3 +2

@Shannon Cain

Yup…that’s exactly how I thought you would react.

I am hopeful that all others who haven’t drank the flea party kool-aid will also see this piece for exactly what it’s worth…not much.

Shannon Cain is a fiction writer

Yup. That’s about right. This piece contains mostly fiction. Good work. I will say this…even though it was largely fictional, it was entertaining…much like the TV show Pawn Stars.

13
83 comments
Dec 27, 2011, 11:22 am
-0 +0

Shannon Cain opined:

Actually, my mistake was feeding the troll. Ah well…live & learn.

Yeah i have been asking for an ignore feature but the staff has yet to respond.

14
533 comments
Dec 27, 2011, 11:30 am
-0 +2

scar typed:

Yeah i have been asking for an ignore feature but the staff has yet to respond.

Mouse over a user’s avatar in a comment, and you’ll see a link to add that person to your ignore list, scar. That feature’s been there since we launched.

15
1763 comments
Dec 27, 2011, 11:58 am
-2 +3

So, moral of the story is that we can add “distorters of the truth” and “very thin skinned” to the long list of the flea party’s character flaws.

 1 2 >

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Dylan Smith/TucsonSentinel.com

Tucson police evicted Occupy Tucson demonstrators from Veinte de Agosto park last week.

Categories

news, politics & government, business, crime & safety, downtown, local, arizona, opinion, guest opinion, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1761
  • Dylan Smith: 531
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 142
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Donate securely with PayPal

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

OR: Subscribe and stretch your donation over time

$5/mo. Printer's Devil
$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by