Sponsored by

Comments on

Monsanto deal no dirtier than recent Pima County triumphs

Tucson can't claim purity of progressive essence with a cash-for-jobs economic development model that heralds the coming Caterpillar's mining division and expansion of Raytheon's missile factory. But the county does have a way to provide clarity to corporate "bad boys."... Read more»

have your say   

2 comments on this story

1
14 comments
Nov 29, 2016, 7:36 pm
-0 +0

There’s a much bigger issue involved and this article, and most of the media, are ignoring it:  Not discussed in the news coverage was Monsanto’s planned cutting of some 2600 jobs nationally, over 11 percent of its workforce.  Or the closing of three research and development centers in Wisconsin, Connecticut and North Carolina with a loss of 90 jobs.  The Marana R&D greenhouse will, according to the company, generate 40-50 full- and part-time jobs over the next five years.

Monsanto received a further “incentive” from the Marana Unified School District Governing Board which accepted a one-time payment of $500,000 in lieu of the nearly $4 million in tax revenue they would have received over the next five years.

And it’s not just Monsanto.  Caterpillar closed its S. Milwaukee plant and disemployed 900 people in a town with 9000 households.  That’s devastating.

Raytheon’s much-vaunted 2000 new jobs, according to The Sentinel, will still leave a net loss of employment with the many layoffs in recent years.  HomeGoods is said to create 900 jobs at a new Distribution Center, but terminated 4,400 workers when they closed a Fall River, Massachusetts, DC.

These are issues that have to be addressed.  Some companies move to China or Mexico; others play off one community against another in search of the better “incentives” deal.  The crony capitalists get the gold while workers and communities get the shaft.  The time is overdue for a national discussion on how to make this right, but Morlock’s article above misses that point completely.

2
3 comments
Dec 1, 2016, 3:13 pm
-0 +2

OK, according to the article Pima County would net $188k in additional property taxes by accepting this deal. Now given the fact that, no matter what we think of Monsanto, they are going to put this facility somewhere, one could say that we might as well get the money. Not that I agree with this logic but it does raise another question that the article does not address.

That question is, How much spending on infrastructure like access roads etc. will the county have to spend to accommodate Monsanto? If it’s ends up costing us millions of dollars the deal doesn’t look so good. Of course when companies are challenging communities to a contest to see who can drop their pants first they always tout the number of high paying jobs their facility will bring to the area. They always highball these figures and what they don’t tell you is that the new employees will be mostly transferred in from out of state and that they factor in the salary of their CEO when they calculate the average salary that they will be paying.

So my question is exactly that, How much infrastructure expense will the county be on the hook for?

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Viriditas/Wikimedia

Anti-Monsanto protesters in Hawaii, 2012.

Categories

news, politics & government, business, enviro, sci/tech, trans/growth, local, arizona, opinion, analysis, breaking, columnist
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 152
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by