Comments on '9 ideas for Congress to address the 99%'
Sponsored by

Comments on

9 ideas for Congress to address the 99%

There are nine simple steps that policymakers can take immediately to reduce inequality, get our upside-down economy back on its feet, and begin restoring the promise of the American Dream.... Read more»

have your say   

2 comments on this story

1
1768 comments
Nov 28, 2011, 9:41 am
-2 +2

For the most part, I like this list. I have to take issue with number 2 though…

I am a capitalist. Some conservatives call themselves “Reagan Republicans”, in that spirit I call myself an “Adam Smith Capitalist”.

That said, part of Capitalism is accountability. If you do something stupid, then you deserve to lose something. When the firms that were “too big to fail” failed, they should have been allowed to fail. When Congress voted to bail them out, every congressperson who voted for the bailouts, especially Giffords, should have been held accountable by losing their jobs.

Anyone who was stupid to buy a house under loan terms they couldn’t handle should be held accountable by losing their house.

No one had a gun to their head to buy a house. When someone offers you a piece of crap tract home in America’s worst city for a quarter of a million dollars, you say no. When someone offers you a loan for two years at a fixed rate, but after that they can change the rate to whatever they want, whenever they want, for any reason they want…you say no. If someone offers you a mortgage payment for something like 60% of your monthly income and you’re not even that secure in your job anyway…you say no.

Most people (want to say “all”, but there MIGHT be exceptions) who got their home foreclosed on deserved it, because they agreed to a deal that either they didn’t really like, or couldn’t handle, or both. I don’t feel sorry for them.

This is yet another example of the Occupy movement blaming the wrong people.

I rent my home. I am now glad I do. I looked for a home when times were allegedly good. The prices were crazy, and I felt that the price tags were just way more than the homes were worth. Turns out I was right.

2
84 comments
Nov 28, 2011, 12:44 pm
-1 +2

It seems a lot of the people who are underwater were taken advantage of by hawkish brokers making misleading claims about the terms of the mortgage.  Most people don’t have the resources to retain a lawyer to help them make sense of the myriad of terms one must agree to in order to take out a mortgage, and that played into the hands of the various brokerage firms.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Atomische, Tom Giebel/Flickr

Categories

news, politics & government, business, education, family/life, nation/world, breaking, Center for American Progress
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 541
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 153
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by