Comments on 'Holmes: Giving up some guns may be necessary to avoid total bans'
Sponsored by

Comments on

Holmes: Giving up some guns may be necessary to avoid total bans

"Thirty seconds; 36 people shot; nine of them dead. Y'all need (yes NEED) to start getting used to the idea that unless you give up SOME of your guns willingly, you might just lose ALL of your guns, UNwillingly."... Read more»

have your say   

1 comment on this story

1
1 comments
Aug 8, 2019, 7:19 am
- +

I couldn’t disagree with you more.  Of course each of these situations is tragic, however to infringe (yes I’ll use that word) on the rights of law abiding citizens is just not the answer. 

Since we are all different human beings, perhaps a shotgun, lever action, revolver, and 22 aren’t adequate for me to defend my family against a home invasion.  And I certainly won’t be able to tell the perp who breaks into my home what he can or cannot use.  And upon turning my AR and semi-auto pistols in, that still doesn’t limit the criminals ability to obtain these now illegal guns. It puts me, the innocent law abiding citizen at a disadvantage for doing nothing wrong.

Again, mass shootings are terrible.  Any loss of life is terrible, whether that be texting while driving, being killed by a drunk driver, drug overdose. Each of those scenarios also could have been avoided. But there are also laws against each of those things. No matter what legislation would be passed, people who are always going to break the law. Sadly that leads to death in these cases. Evil people do evil things, that’s what they do.

And I’ll end with this: I find it very hypocritical to those who are so concerned about telling me my right to own firearms, saying they are so concerned with children and innocent life, yet could care less about the FACT that millions of innocent children each year are murdered, butchered, and that it’s called ‘healthcare’. Of course these mass shootings are terrible, the people who commit them monsters, but there is a much broader form of death, committed against those who are the most vulnerable, and who cannot stand up for themselves and their right to life.  That’s a much bigger issue than what kind of guns I can own and why. Let’s get our priorities straight America, protecting the innocent babies, keeping families together, because I believe that is a huge proponent of the criminal/mass shooter, the breakdown of the nuclear family.

Join the conversation...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Dayton Police

The gun and 100-round magazine used in a massacre in Dayton, Ohio, this weekend.

Categories

news, politics & government, crime & safety, opinion, guest opinion, nation/world, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 541
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 153
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by