Sponsored by

Comments on

New revelations point to a Darrell Issa conspiracy

On Fast and Furious, did Did Darrell Issa just make up the whole thing? Bombshell reporting in Fortune Magazine and the Washington Post sheds new light on the festering, wormy mess that is his probe of an ATF gun-smuggling investigation.... Read more»

have your say   

6 comments on this story

1
1158 comments
Jun 29, 2012, 8:44 am
-1 +1

You got me again Sentinel…I was going to read it until I saw the by-line.

2
3 comments
Jun 29, 2012, 10:48 am
-0 +1

A partial solution going forward is to help elect someone else to Issa’s Congressional seat.  That is Democrat Jerry Tetalman.  www.JerryforCongress2012.com The 49th district can really use the country’s help.  If the Independants and Democrats get out and vote, we can win this November.

3
3 comments
Jun 29, 2012, 11:01 am
-0 +4

According to a Fortune Magazine journalist who spent six months investigating Fast and Furious, the bottom line is that lack of gun control in Arizona is how the guns get into Mexico and the ATF could not pursue the buyers because they were not allowed to by prosecutors.  The “whistle-blower” was the rogue person who let guns walk and at first Holder didn’t know about it, then he corrected the record.  America is the largest manufacturer and exporter of guns and ammunition.  The National Rifle Association pressured the Democrats who voted for contempt.  What does anyone need an assualt weapon for?  Nothing is in the shadows anymore.  The NRA has power and is manipulating this event.

4
267 comments
Jun 29, 2012, 8:27 pm
-0 +2

Darrell Issa ... [shakes head]

If you missed it, this New Yorker story published early last year sheds further light on Issa’s credibility:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/01/24/110124fa_fact_lizza

5
1 comments
Jun 30, 2012, 4:39 pm
-0 +2

“issa manufactures guns. When that agent got killed he knew there would be a call to stop all guns from crossing the border into mexico. But the Mexican cartel are the largest purchaser of US made guns. So Issa deliberately concocted and set up the gun scandal. And look how effectively the scam worked. Guns are still flowing freely and legally into Mexico. There is no call for gun control. He embarrassed the president, diminished Holder’s ability to investigate his leaks and GOP election fraud, made a name for himself , and walked away a richer man. That guy is master criminal.”

6
1 comments
Jul 3, 2012, 8:19 am
-0 +0

Let me see if I have this straight.  Voth’s group is sent to Arizona on a mission only to find out, the mission isn’t funded.  How patriotic that they “scrounge around for supplies”.  Who sent them there?  I’d like to know that.  Who was responsible for proper funding? I would like to know that.  Please see the You Tube video of CSPAN news conference with Napolitano and Deputy Attorney General David Ogden March 2009. Voth’s group does all this work, only to find out Arizona prosecutors can’t use what they presented, or won’t?
1.  Didn’t they work this out first in establishing the mission? 
2.  Weren’t they aware of Arizona’s “laws”?
3.  If the laws in Arizona are supposedly at fault, why did the FEDERAL attorneys write to the US SENTENCING COMMISSION to change the penalties?  This sounds FEDERAL to me, not STATE.
4.  How come, AFTER Terry is killed, they can NOW charge Avila with dealing guns without a license, but not before?
And the final blow, it comes to light that two of the suspects being tracked by ATF agents are actually FBI informants using money supplied by the Bureau to purchase guns.  So, the taxpayer is supporting an agency mission to investigate another agency’s mission; neither of which are successful.  This is just insane, and typical governmental bull***t.  One hand doesn’t know what the other is doing, and as a result, thousands of Mexicans are killed, along with one of our agents. 
If this whole thing doesn’t stink, I don’t know what does.  This article sounds like an attempt to paint Voth as a victim, when actually, at the very least, he is an incompetent fool. 
How could anybody in their right mind not want this completely investigated?

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Stanford University/Flickr

U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa

Categories

news, politics & government, border, crime, local, arizona, opinion, analysis, nation/world, breaking, columnist, mexico/latin america
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1158
  • Dylan Smith: 327
  • Roberto De Vido: 267
  • buddhaboy: 209
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 144
  • Joan: 86
  • scar: 82
  • janamg: 72
  • azjimn2son: 63
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews