Sponsored by

Comments on

Barber: Health care reform far from perfect

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court carefully weighed in on Congress’s 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act. Although the court upheld major portions of the act, it is far from perfect.... Read more»

have your say   

1 comment on this story

1
3 comments
Jun 28, 2012, 11:27 am
-2 +0

I am a Conservative not disappointed at all that someone of Ron Barber’s character and experience is my new Congressman. He actually sets a new narrative for what it is to be an Arizonan first, a Democrat second. It is too late to opine on the Surpreme Court and they don’t care what our opinion is, anyway. I do give kudos to Chief Justice Roberts for his imagination and creative method of finding the “AHA” Constitutional. Despite Minority Speaker Pelosi’s promise we’d all know what is in the Act after it’s signed, most of the damage (in revelations) will be done when things become apparent after the November Elections. The insurance lobby won, illegals will still resist buying the mandatory policy, and in time nothing about the act will be “affordable.” I do feel for anyone who could not get insurance before, and mandating it does not suddenly make it affordable. Instead of being unable to buy access to high quality care they’ll be able to buy marganialized inferior healthcare - sometimes through tax credits (someone else’s taxes pay). This Law of the Land stands until Repeal becomes the Law of the Land. The real problems with healthcare are where Congress should have directed its attention: higher costs and skyrocketing premiums. The “affordable” promise of Medicare D went out the window once enacted. Prescription costs skyrocketed. Don’t see trends changing. Costs going up, benefits going down.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Categories

news, politics & government, health, local, arizona, opinion, guest opinion, nation/world, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1153
  • Dylan Smith: 325
  • Roberto De Vido: 267
  • buddhaboy: 208
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 143
  • Joan: 86
  • scar: 82
  • janamg: 72
  • azjimn2son: 63
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews