Sponsored by

Comments on

Opinion: Setting the record straight on border crime

Those who support the Arizona’s draconian new immigration law have justified it with hyperbole, exaggeration, and falsehoods about the state’s crime rate. It’s ironic that violent crime rates in the state have been declining.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

1
1 comments
Jun 20, 2010, 1:53 pm
-0 +0

Yeah, right. Now go explain that to Mrs. Krentz and to Deputy and Mrs. Puroll. And to the people living on the border whose homes were broken into 14 times in the last year by armed illegals. And to the people who were duct taped when illegals broke into their homes and robbed them at machete point earlier this year. And to the Mexican border ranchers who were killed for control of their ranches, and to the Mexican border rancher who was tortured, killed and dumped in the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, and to the Mexican ranch foremen who are presently in the custody of kidnappers.And to remote AZ border ranchers who feel they need to be armed at all times even inside their own homes, even in the bathroom. And to the Border agents and deputies who have been shot at, and their widows.

I personally was a first responder to a mass murder committed by illegal aliens on illegal aliens, and out in the middle of nowhere with no cell phone coverage. Gee, that was fun-NOT. Has the author ever dealt with anything like that?

Did the author mention that just a couple of years ago the Border Patrol reported that 1 out of ten illegals they detain already had violent criminal records, and that today that number has risen to one out of five?

If our border is so much safer now than 2006, then tell us how many American citizens were murdered in cold blood by illegal immigrants in 2006 minding their own business on their own property versus 2010. How many law enforcement officers were murdered by illegal immigrants versus today? How many kidnappings were there in Phoenix then versus today, and why are there currently about 95 convicted murderers in the Phoenix jail who are illegal aliens? Why did the author fail to mention that Phoenix is the kidnapping capital of the USA?

Anyone can spin any story using statistics, statistics and da***d lies.  Did the author compare trends in the violent crime rates in AZ against the drop in numbers of illegals trying to cross since 2006 due to the economic conditions? Why let inconvenient facts get in the way of her own political rhetoric and that of the ever-politically correct Janet Napolitano?

Why must liberals always lump “immigrants” together without separating illegal immigrants from legal immigrants? Because the facts would be too clear that way?  Why can’t the author recognize that Mohammed Atta might be a less desirable example of “immigrant” than Albert Einstein? What an insult she has dealt to Dr. Einstein and every other person who has immigrated to this country by respecting and following our laws.

Do we really need the Chief of the San Jose Police telling Arizona how to govern itself?  Who elected him to any Arizona office? Is San Jose suddenly located on the border? What makes him the expert? Do Arizonans have some reason to want his opinion? Did we ask for it???? For that matter, did we ask for the author’s opinion obviously sent to us by electronic submission straight from anywhere BUT Arizona??? Has the author spent any time at all in the remote regions of Arizona’s border?  Why doesn’t she come park her RV down here and spend the night in ANY wilderness area on our Mexican border if she insists it is so safe? After all, real people DO live here, but maybe they don’t agree with her politically motivated rhetoric because they LIVE the facts, and she might feel uncomfortable around people who arent’ afraid of speaking the truth.

The “Center for American Progress” states in their own website,
“The Center for American Progress is dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through progressive ideas and action.”  The word “progressive” is just a code-speak word that actually translates directly to “communist.” The two words are fully interchangeable. But it’s politically incorrect to use the “c” word because the commies so love to mislead.

Speaking of Communist, I find it highly interesting that Hillary Clinton chose to announce on her visit to Ecuador that the Dept. of Justice intends to sue Arizona over our law.  Ecuador has an open border with Communist China allowing any Chinese person to visit Ecuador without a visa. The purpose is apparently to facilitate illegal immigration to the US from China through Ecuador.

Who’s looking out for Arizonans? Certainly not the federal government Or their lofty smarter than anyone cronies hiding behind computers in wealthy tax-exempt NGOs.

2
28 comments
Jun 21, 2010, 7:42 am
-1 +0

Ok look at this way,
Clean up the drug use in America make it legal
or lock up drug users.Just look at the meth use in the suburbs.
As for communists twist wow the cry of Beck and Tea party.
If the feds had a better program for people who would like to come to the USA like open borders, one would have to check in with the BP to be checked for pass crimes it would stop a lot of heart ache for people.
We in America offer some other nations don’t
FREEDOM are you willing to give up any part of that to blame others for you fears?
So we must stop the drug use or make it legal…

3
5 comments
Jun 21, 2010, 5:52 pm
-0 +0

I feel for all the families of the victims of Americas way of making gangs and mafias. Please Join NORML get educated vote yes on prop 203 for medical marijuana and lets get our government whipped back into shape with a self funding initiative and get finances back in the hands of our government. By paying sales tax on marijuana and eliminating gangs biggest money source and move it into the hands of good honest people with a business license. Together we can stop violence from prohibition and create enough money to fund our borders safety. PLEASE BELIEVE ME. CANNABIS WILL SAVE THE WORLD IF OUR GOVERNMENT WOULD STOP PROHIBITION!!

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Lance and Erin/Flickr

Categories

nation/world, news, politics & government, border, crime & safety, local, arizona, opinion, analysis, breaking, Center for American Progress
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1765
  • Dylan Smith: 539
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 149
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by