Sponsored by

Comments on

Patterson: SB 1070 is 'flawed solution to a very serious problem'

Gov. Jan Brewer and her Republican friends have been running around Arizona dismissing concerns about Arizona’s new immigration law, SB 1070. ... Read more»

have your say   

2 comments on this story

Jun 16, 2010, 6:21 am
-0 +1

Both parties are rearranging deck chairs and pointing fingers at one another. This is not surprising.

What is surprising is how few people seem to get the obvious truth at the core of the illegal immigration problem: the people buying the drugs and hiring immigrants.

That’s the head of the snake. As long as there’s somebody willing to pay for the drugs and for cheap, exploitable labor there will continue to be people willing to sneak across the border to provide the product.

Remember the law Arizona passed that was going to solve the problem by going after businesses that hired undocumented workers? Businesses fought it vigorously, but lost. Or did they? It seems the battle went subterranean. Last I checked only three businesses had been prosecuted under this law. Clearly, they found a way around it.

And no, it’s not because they have been scared into cleaning up their act. I know a person who was hired by a convenience store in Phoenix and then fired when the owner discovered he was a legal resident. He’d thought he could get away with paying below minimum wage and not paying withholding. Which he did, after he fired my friend and found a Hispanic who was undocumented.

People in this country illegally make great targets for exploitation. They have no recourse, and if they object the owner can simply turn them in to ICE. Problem solved.

As long as we fail to get to and eliminate root causes of drug addiction there will be entrepreneurs willing to meet the need. It’s a highly profitable business, with the side benefit of having no taxes to pay. Cartels now have more money than small countries, and with their resources and ruthless disregard for human life, they operate with little fear of paying for their crimes.

So I’m sorry, Daniel, but the Democrats are no better than the Republicans in this charade. Their approach may be more humane, but when Democrats have been in charge, as they are now in Washington, they are no more effective in solving problems than the Republicans. Both are more concerned with gaining/holding power than risking political capital to actually take bold action.

That would require standing up to exploitive businesses, aka campaign contributors. It would require junking ineffective anti-drug programs and digging deeper to find and address root causes. Both parties are too invested in the status quo to do anything other than enact feel-food legislation, blame the other side and keep on sucking up to their donors.

Jun 21, 2010, 6:03 pm
-0 +0

There is a way to dramatically slow down the movement of immigration to Arizona. Remove the scheduling of hemp away from a class one drug. It’s not a drug its a plant thats safer than water. Use it industrially and we could save the world.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Rep. Daniel Patterson


Flags, news, politics & government, border, local, arizona, opinion, guest opinion, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 151
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by


I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.


Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by