Sponsored by

Comments on

Buckley: My first and last days at the Tucson Citizen

For 22 years I worked for the Tucson Citizen newspaper, and for that experience I am eternally grateful. But today I'll write about my first and last days at the Citizen, which ended when the press ground to a halt four years ago, May 15, 2009.... Read more»

have your say   

4 comments on this story

1
1766 comments
May 15, 2013, 4:17 pm
-2 +2

Normally I am rather annoyed when the media reports on itself. After all, journalistic outlets are supposed to document the course of history, and not be a part of it (or try to be). However, this is the first time I recall seeing the f-{censored } word used in the Sentinel, which is so totally awesome that I’ll forgive the annoyance.

That said, I was thrilled to see the Citizen close. With each passing year it had become more and more biased left, and the moderation of the comments section had become devoid of any sort of integrity that its demise was good for the community.

My most pervasive memory of the Citizen’s waning years was David Teibel, who worked the city desk. He is the laziest reporter probably in journalism history. The five W’s meant nothing to this guy. What should have been the most interesting part of the paper each day was filled with holes. They weren’t stories, they were fragments. To this day I have no idea why that guy wasn’t fired.

But, I do have to admit…the Arizona Daily Star has become so horribly left-biased, and the comments section…ugh, forget about it, that in comparison to that the Tucson Citizen looked pretty good…and that’s sad.

2
1766 comments
May 15, 2013, 4:20 pm
-3 +2

My use of the F word is censored, even though I read it in the story? OK, for the first time ever, I am officially going to complain about the Sentinel’s comments section. If it is in the piece I’m commenting on, then I should be able to use it, too.

Not cool.

3
539 comments
May 15, 2013, 5:27 pm
-0 +2

@Bret Linden,

You realize the same guy who moderated the comments on the Citizen is in charge over here, right?

There’s a list of words that are auto-censored in the comments, but occasionally allowed in stories, because what’s posted under a headline is seen by an editor before it’s presented to the public. Comments aren’t pre-moderated, and we don’t need blithering idiots spouting off with an endless chain of profanity. If commenters kept their use of those words to an appropriate level, it wouldn’t be a problem. But experience shows they don’t.

As it says over on the right, “Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you’re creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say ‘%*$& no’ to cursing for cursing’s sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn’t contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.”

A quick Google will show you that Dan’s not the first one around here to get Anglo-Saxon in his reporting.

And, given their place in society, journalism organizations are as much a part of history as any other business or group. Just as with any other topic, we fail to learn the lessons of history at our peril.

In the case of media, experience shows us that local news organizations are at their healthiest, and produce the best work, when they are locally owned, with local reporters covering the news. Giant chains pay their newsroom but a fraction of their revenues, and are more concerned about quarterly results and stock prices than about the communities from which they profit.

4
1766 comments
May 15, 2013, 8:55 pm
-0 +0

Dylan Smith asserted:

@Bret Linden,
You realize the same guy who moderated the comments on the Citizen is in charge over here, right?

I was about 90% certain of that, but now I am at 100%. I thought it was either you, or some woman’s name I can’t remember…I can see the headshot in my mind’s eye, and it is pretty unsightly. Boyce or something like that. It’s not coming back to me.

And, I will say, publicly, that you have come a long way since your Citizen days. I’ve given you public talkings-to during the Citizen days, and apparently you took them to heart because, other than today, I have never been censored a single time in over a thousand posts or whatever it is. You are to be commended for that. I couldn’t give you the same commendation during the Citizen days, so double-props to you for your self-improvement.

In the case of media, experience shows us that local news organizations are at their healthiest, and produce the best work, when they are locally owned, with local reporters covering the news. Giant chains pay their newsroom but a fraction of their revenues, and are more concerned about quarterly results and stock prices than about the communities from which they profit.

I’ll agree with this paragraph, and I’ll add to it if I may. Generally speaking, local reporters are more passionate about goings-on in their own community as opposed to those hundreds or thousands of miles away. Thus, in many cases the research will be more thorough, better questions will be asked, and the stories will be more complete if investigated my local reporters. This is why I like the Sentinel. The Sentinel doesn’t cover a lot of local issues (which I personally blame on a lack of staffing rather than a lack of passion), but the local stories that the Sentinel does cover and much more thorough, well-researched, and unbiased. Much more so than the Arizona Daily Star, and, yes, much more so than the Tucson Citizen in its waning years.

I’m not saying this as a shill Dylan, but I think perhaps you’re being too modest here, or perhaps you’re still personally attached to your former coworkers and don’t want to unintentionally belittle them somehow…but the Sentinel is far superior to the waning years of the Citizen is pretty much each and every measurable way. Instead of publishing a piece every may about the Citizen, maybe you should publish something annually about the direction the Sentinel is going.

Let the Citizen go. It is dead, and that really is better for everybody.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

courtesy Dan Buckley

The Citizen newsroom.

Categories

news, business, media & journalism, history, local, arizona, opinion, guest opinion, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1764
  • Dylan Smith: 537
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 145
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by