Sponsored by

Comments on

The end of newspapers and the decline of democracy

If newspapers were a baseball team, they would be the Mets—without the hope for “next year.”... Read more»

have your say   

8 comments on this story

1
1768 comments
Mar 24, 2012, 12:55 pm
-0 +1

I believe this article is overly pessimistic, and/or places blame in the wrong places.

Random bloggers aren’t the only ones fudging the truth and conveniently ignoring facts to get more views or push a particular agenda…the Arizona Daily Star does the exact same thing on a near-daily basis, and they’re considered a “real newspaper”...

Here’s the thing…regardless of the internet, or whatever super-duper future technology that will come along and replace it…people at large are always going to have a desire to know what’s happening in the world around them. This is true on a global scale, a national scale, a local scale. The smarter people are always going to seek out the most credible source for this information. And, even though journalistic integrity is a dying discipline, I personally believe there will always be a group of people dedicated to honest, thorough, honest reporting, and building a reputation as being a credible news-source. This was true with paper, it’s true of the internet, and it will be true with telepathic signals or whatever the future technology holds.

Newspapers may be dying, but journalism in itself is not. Journalistic integrity may not be practiced by as many as it once was, but I like to believe that it will always be practiced by some.

I believe the author of this piece is threatened by the information age. He wants what the ADS wants, which is an attitude of “this is how you should think, this is how you should feel, this is how you should vote”, and readers are just supposed to blindly do as they’re told. Well, thanks to the internet, those days are drawing to a close…and this author doesn’t like it at all.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to read what is on wikileaks today…

2
542 comments
Mar 24, 2012, 2:35 pm
-0 +1

@Bret Linden

Alterman wrongly conflates a dying medium with the information it is meant to convey.

Quality reporting is necessary to provide communities the information they need to make wise decisions. In the future, that isn’t going to be provided by a newspaper with a declining readership.

He also ignores the fact that daily newspapers spend 70+ percent of their cash flow (after profits, a margin that used to be in the 30 percent range) on physical production and distribution. Traditional newspaper publishers run trucking companies more than they run newsrooms.

Only 14 percent of a newspaper’s expenses are in the newsroom, according to a Moody’s study.

For an online news organization, the vast majority of cash flow goes toward reporting. If that organization is a nonprofit, like TucsonSentinel.com, there’s even more of the pie that goes directly toward the goal of quality journalism.

3
1768 comments
Mar 24, 2012, 3:05 pm
-0 +1

@Dylan Smith

Very good take Dylan. I like it when we agree, just because it happens to rarely :). News is news is news…what gets into our brains is much more important than how it gets there. Either this author doesn’t get that, or he ignores it.

I’m thinking perhaps this author penned a similar piece in the past, expressing his displeasure toward the demise of the buggy industry once the automobile caught on.

4
542 comments
Mar 24, 2012, 3:28 pm
-1 +1

@Bret Linden

I wonder if Alterman sees any irony in having this column published on the website of the Center for American Progress, a left-wing thinktank. ; )

5
43 comments
Mar 24, 2012, 3:55 pm
-0 +1

Neat picture of the statue of J. Hale Steinman in downtown, Lancaster, PA. He was publisher of Lancaster New Era and Intelligencer Journal.  Also owned TV stations, including KVOA-TV in Tucson early on.  (Or at least his family owned KVOA-TV).

6
7 comments
Apr 3, 2012, 6:09 am
-0 +0

There’s a similar thing in my field:

The piano put the harpsichord manufacturers out of business. Now the advent of quality, low cost, DIGITAL pianos are putting the piano out of business and pianists everywhere are squawking.

Unfortunately for them, progress marches onward. The “old guard” laments. The public ignores them and continues to move into the future.

No wonder this clown laments the demise of his controlled news source. The Internet is the “liberty tree” of the modern day.

Notice how he cleverly manipulates statistics. We read in the first point how, once the money figures are manipulated for inflation, they are actually lower than the 1984 he quotes, supposedly to make you feel sorry for his newspapers. Whaaaa…(sound of tears falling!) He never does give the date that the manipulated money figure takes their profit back to. With this kind of “reporting” it’s no wonder folks are turning to the Internet.

7
1768 comments
Apr 3, 2012, 9:57 am
-0 +0

@Dan Starr

No disrespect at all, but I’m not sure your business is a good example. In my life I have actually seen people reading newspapers…

Especially growing up, I have spent a lot of time in malls. Quite often I would walk by the piano store and would never see a customer in there. I never understood how those places stay in business. I’m not pretending to be a doctorate of business admin or anything, but I do know that a business needs customers to keep going…right?

8
7 comments
Apr 3, 2012, 10:18 am
-0 +0

Bret - and a tip of the hat to you, as well.

It is, as you’ve made clear, a conversation. Cool!

Yes, piano stores do need customers. Here in Tucson, we have had as many as five stores at once. Now we have two, which is more appropriate for a market this size. Still, my point is not relevant to the number of customers but to the march of new technology.

In that context, my comment is quite germane.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Puzzler4879/Flickr

Categories

news, business, media & journalism, opinion, analysis, nation/world, breaking, Center for American Progress
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 152
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by