Sponsored by

Comments on

'Alone in a desert of strangers' - Thoughts on the Tucson shooting

It is striking that politicians and pundits have avoided discussing the relationship between the shooting and our sense of community—or, more accurately, between the shooting and our absence of community. By separating the rampage from its cultural context, we allow ourselves to dodge hard questions.... Read more»

have your say   

4 comments on this story

1
3 comments
Jan 16, 2011, 4:10 pm
-0 +1

Fabulous writing and excellent observations. I agree that it is difficult to get “connection” here in Tucson. But I’m more committed to making the effort now more than ever.

2
270 comments
Jan 16, 2011, 4:45 pm
-0 +0

Well, correlation is in fact NOT causation.

You raise some good points, but Loughner’s actions have little to do with the closeness or not of Tucson’s community.

Loughner is almost certainly mentally disturbed. He would be disturbed regardless of where he lived – in Tucson, New York City, Cairo or a tiny Inuit village far north of the Arctic Circle.

Arizona’s lax gun laws served as an enabler, but they enabled Loughner to shoot 19 rather than stab three or four (as happens on occasion in Japan, where I live, and where society is incredibly homogeneous and gun laws are extremely restrictive). We are, after all, an “empty the mag” culture (and thanks to Hollywood, we have exported that culture around the world).

Whatever view you may have about Arizona’s gun laws, and I see them as criminally negligent, they represent the will of the people – Arizona residents and more broadly, American citizens.

The occasional mass shooting is a price Americans have proven willing to pay for the “right to bear arms”, again and again and again. Perhaps owning and carrying and shooting (or fantasizing about shooting) guns helps us get in touch with our inner Dirty Harrys. Or our inner Daniel Boones. More often, we are put in touch with our inner Aaron Burrs, or Alexander Hamiltons ... or Gabrielle Giffords.

The question of diagnosis and treatment of mental illness is not new, and anyone who has witnessed mental illness among family members, or friends, or in any other context, e.g. medical practice, law enforcement or simply in line at Starbucks, knows it is a complex and difficult issue. There are myriad manifestations of mental illness, nearly all relatively harmless to both the afflicted and those around him or her. Following incidents like the Loughner shooting, we frequently read comment from family members, friends and acquaintances, saying, “We had no idea.” And that’s the trouble: mental illness is for the most part invisible. Diagnosis is difficult. Treatment requires the cooperation of the afflicted, which sometimes is not forthcoming.

The Loughner attack WAS an isolated incident, and statistics prove that. Yes, mental health care is important. Yes, Arizona should take a hard look at the laws that enabled Loughner to purchase a weapon and empty a 31-bullet magazine. But is there something wrong with the Tucson community? No more than any other community of more than a few dozen people.

3
2 comments
Jan 16, 2011, 4:56 pm
-0 +0

I’ve lived in many cities across this country. Even after several years of living there, I moved away from each feeling no sense of community. Upon moving to Tucson, I found the difference….me. I’m a shy person and don’t want to “join” any clubs. But I began to seek out people with whom I could share time. Within weeks, I was going to events with my new friends. If you want community, you can have it. If you don’t, don’t. There is enough diversity in this town to find what you need. It’s up to you.

4
1 comments
Jan 30, 2011, 10:55 am
-0 +0

Thank you for this brilliant piece of writing.
One dreads to ponder on how alone this troubled and disturbed young man felt in this desert of strangers before his awful rampage.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Dylan Smith/TucsonSentinel.com

A woman watches others at the UMC shooting memorial Friday.

Categories

news, politics & government, crime & safety, family/life, local, opinion, guest opinion, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 151
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by