There are several portions of Tucson City Councilman Richard Fimbres’ guest column about the U.S. Postal Service’s proposal to consolidate Tucson’s processing and distribution operations with those in Phoenix that require clarification.... Read more»
Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.
We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.
We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.
Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.
Keep in mind:
TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:
Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.
Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.
Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.
What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.
We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.
We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.
Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

1 comment on this story
Mr. Grigel wrote this letter with the skills of a politician…he thanked Fimbres for his comments, said he was clarifying Fimbres’ comments, and then pretty much said nothing that actually addressed the comments Fimbres made.
On another note, I’m not able to wrap my head around how much this will save the Postal Service a significant amount of money. It’s the same amount of mail, so it would be the same amount of man-hours to sort and process it, right? So what’s the difference if you do it here or in Phoenix?
I don’t know the arrangement for the physical building, but if the USPS is renting the facility then that savings in rent would be offset by the spike in fuel costs required to shuttle all this mail to and from Phoenix each day, right?
And, about the loss in jobs…again, same amount of mail, same amount of man-hours. Are we going to suddenly pay the Phoenix sorters overtime? How is paying someone time-and-a-half cheaper than paying someone else straight time for the same amount of work?
If Mr. Grigel wants to sell his grand plan to us, then perhaps rather than a obsficating letter that talks about saving money and the survival of the USPS, perhaps he can outline for us exactly HOW the plan is projected to save money…