Sponsored by

Comments on

Still time to stop closure of Cherrybell postal center

I want to thank the 600 people who attended the Dec. 28 public meeting about the potential closure of the Cherrybell Post Office processing center. Tucson and Southern Arizona showed that we are strongly opposed to closing the facility.... Read more»

have your say   

5 comments on this story

1
80 comments
Jan 4, 2012, 1:11 pm
-0 +2

This was a good meeting and I was proud of Tucsonans for the turnout and the points raised in the meeting.  The USPS is ignoring the root of the problem here, trying to use bandages to fix a hemorrhage.  We have to look at the federal level, at this Postal Accountability Enhancement Act (PAEA), which requires the USPS to do something no other business or government agency is required to do: pre-fund future retirees’ health benefits.  The USPS is required to shell out $5.5 billion every year for 10 years, to have the funds set aside for 75 years of future retirees.  This is what is destroying the USPS, and the law has to be amended or repealed.  It is curious that the writer of this law and the two co-sponsors all have UPS (United Parcel Service) within their top-10 contributors.

Perhaps someone else who was at the meeting can recall the bills that Grijalva mentioned that would fix the trouble the USPS is in?  I think one of them was H.R. 1351 but there were some others also.

2
609 comments
Jan 5, 2012, 10:33 am
-0 +0

Holy poop! Scar is making an intelligent post that I actually agree with!

I have a few issues with this…well, this issue.

First of all, while I appreciate Fimbres’ efforts it is difficult for me to take him seriously. He is on the city council that seemingly does their best to destroy this community from within, drive away anything that might lead to prosperity, and keep those away who might bring prosperity to our community. Why is Fimbres all of a sudden doing something that’s actually right for our community? Is he going to keep it up? Is he going to get heat from the rest of the council?

Next, Grijalva’s name should be kept as far out of this fight as possible. Let’s all acknowledge a fact here…of the 435 Congressional districts in this country, the only one he would ever, ever, EVER be elected in is AZ CD7, and then he only barely got elected, and only then because he has the right skin color and he’s blatantly open borders. This being the case, no one of any reason or intelligence takes him seriously, or considers anything he has to say. In fact, whenever Grijalva says anything, I personally automatically assume the opposite is true, and I’m sure millions of others do, as well. My point…Grijalva, even if he is trying to help, would only hurt the cause of keeping the Cherrybell facility here. He can be most helpful by keeping his mouth shut.

3
609 comments
Jan 5, 2012, 10:38 am
-0 +0

OK, a follow-up point…

This community has clearly and abundantly made it obvious-time and time again-that the electorate here will never hold any government official accountable for their misbehavior or stupid decisions, no matter how embarrassing or harmful to this community. The elected officials here know they have full impunity to do whatever they want to do, without any consequences whatsoever.

My point…if the elected officials around here enjoy that impunity, then what is a government agency not beholden to voters going to do?

I’m telling you…the meetings were just for show. The USPS is just going to do whatever they’re going to do, regardless of what we think or whether or not it’s right.

4
80 comments
Jan 5, 2012, 11:19 am
-0 +0

Yep. Now if you could just keep the cheap shots to yourself we might have a pleasant message board here.

5
609 comments
Jan 5, 2012, 12:00 pm
-0 +0

@scar

Can’t do that. I am what Bob Walkup would call “uncivil” and what Sheriff Dupnik would call “vitriolic”....and those are two wonderful role models whose opinions mean the world to me.

s/o

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Categories

news, politics & government, business, sci/tech, trans/growth, local, arizona, opinion, guest opinion, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 609
  • Dylan Smith: 247
  • Roberto De Vido: 241
  • buddhaboy: 202
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 141
  • Joan: 83
  • scar: 80
  • azjimn2son: 63
  • tiponeill: 38
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews