- Radar van locations, traffic incidents & today's gas prices
- City Hall fights transparency in manager search1
- Superintendents: State budget cuts threaten technical, trade education
- Census: Fewer Arizona households received food stamps in 2013
- Police & fire scanners
- Babeu tells House panel there’s ‘no law’ on immigration under Obama7
- Douglas folds in showdown with Ducey over firings6
- Endangered Mexican gray wolves get room to roam5
- Bill would create REAL ID-compliant licenses – if Arizonans pay for them4
- High court grills both sides in Arizona redistricting case4
Posted Mar 20, 2012, 9:40 am
American officials have said that a classified war simulation that was held this month to examine the results of an Israeli attack on Iran showed that the strike could lead to a regional war, drawing the United States into the conflict, according to The New York Times.
The war game, called "Internal Look," showed that an Israeli strike against Iran and retaliation from Iran could pull the United States into the conflict and leave hundreds of Americans dead. The United States also would likely retaliate by carrying out its own strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
The officials insisted that the war game was not a rehearsal for military action and the scenario's results were not the only possible outcome in the real world, according to The Times.
The results of the game raised concerns that America would not be able to stay uninvolved if Israel's tensions with Iran escalated. Gen. James N. Mattis, who commands U.S. forces in the Middle East, Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia, reportedly told aides that an Israeli strike would have dire consequences for the region and for U.S. forces.
Bloomberg reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is likely still leaning towards a pre-emptive strike, on the premise that Iranian citizens would overthrow the unpopular regime. Israeli officials also might believe that Iran would cover up a strike that took out six to eight Iranian facilities, like the Syrian government did with the Israeli attacks in 2007 on its nuclear facilities, rather than retaliate.
Reuters reported that though three-quarters of Israelis are opposed to Israel striking Iran, jitteriness about the war has not spread to protests by the Israeli populace. So far, protests against conflict with Iran have taken the muted form of anti-war exhibits, newspaper ads and a Facebook campaign stating that Israelis don't want to bomb Iran.
Meanwhile, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Monday that Israel viewed the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran with greater urgency than the rest of the world, according to the Associated Press. The Israelis' most recent assessments suggest that Iran's nuclear facilities will soon be immune to the disruptions caused by a military strike.
Israel's President Shimon Peres sent Iranians a traditional greeting for the Persian new year on Monday, wishing for "peace and coexistence" despite the tensions between the two countries, said the AP.
TucsonSentinel.com relies on contributions from our readers to support our reporting on Tucson's civic affairs. Donate to TucsonSentinel.com today!
If you're already supporting us, please encourage your friends, neighbors, colleagues and customers to help support quality local independent journalism.
On Tuesday, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said, "We do not have nuclear weapons and we will not build them but in the face of aggression from the enemies, whether from America or the Zionist regime, to defend ourselves we will attack on the same level as the enemies attack us," on national television, according to Reuters.