- Radar van locations, traffic incidents & today's gas prices
- Tucson inventor’s Spider-Man toy lands in Supreme Court
- Ducey signs controversial abortion bill
- Tucson's Garden of Gethsemane park closed by vandalism
- Wildfire forecast 'normal', but firefighters are preparing for the worst
- Bill would create REAL ID-compliant licenses – if Arizonans pay for them7
- Legislature moves to block cities from banning plastic bags5
- City Hall fights transparency in manager search5
- Biggs finds supply-side economics embarrassing & dangerous4
- High court grills both sides in Arizona redistricting case4
Posted Jan 3, 2013, 12:09 am
The New York Times lost its latest bid to get more information on the Obama administration's drone strikes.
A federal judge ruled today that the administration did not break the law in refusing the paper's Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request for materials relating to the targeted kllings of suspected terrorists, Politico reported.
The Times is seeking legal justification for the drone strikes, according to Reuters.
Reporters Charlie Savage and Scott Shane joined the newspaper in filing the lawsuit in December 2011 after they were denied information about the program, including the killing of U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen.
The program has come under fire from multiple civil rights groups as a way to kill Americans without due process, although Attorney General Eric Holder has denied that contention, Reuters reported.
The New York Times said it plans to appeal the ruling.