Sponsored by

Comments on

Report: Immigrants increasing economic strength

Since the 2010 U.S. census, the number of naturalized citizens has increased substantially in Texas, and the state's immigrants account for significant purchasing power and economic output, according to an analysis by a Washington-based think tank urging immigration reform.... Read more»

have your say   

5 comments on this story

1
179 comments
Jun 3, 2013, 5:16 pm
-0 +0

Start blasting “NO AMNESTY! DROP THIS IMMIGRATION BILL!” Send scathing faxes into the in-boxes of every member of the House and Senate using the mailing system atwww.numbersusa.com .  It’s free or you can help out with a donation? Let lawmakers distinguish that, “A vote for Amnesty means NO REELECTION FOR YOU!”  We can jam their phones at toll-free—1-888-978-3094—.  Set up your message on Twitter or Facebook as the Left is doing with their counterproductive misleading information. You can reach millions of people on these Social networks, so we can hammer away at these slick politicians

The Liberals are not going to tell you the truth, as illegal aliens gaining legal status, means future votes.  Whereas the Republican elites it means plenty more profits for their corporate friends. While we pay for all the illegal alien families living expenses, they walk away and expect us through forced taxes to pay for it all. It’s the same with the Guest Workers on the farms? Who do you think pay for the Health care, education for their kids. Not the agricultural community? YOU DO! WE CAN WIN AGAINST THIS SHAM, BUT WE MUST STRIKE NOW! As I have said many times read the true information those surfaces in the E-media published connections at www.americanpatrol.com about the daily news on illegal immigration, the costs incurred by taxpayers and happenings across the country.

Every American no matter the state they live in, should check out the incredible stomach churning outlay that illegal aliens costs Los Angeles County or any of the 50 states and in any one month, let alone annually?  For stopping unauthorized job seekers, for voting, claiming welfare and for credit security we must demand that the Federal government issue a federal biometric identification card.  The reason the U.S. government don’t want to hand out National ID cards, that they will not be able to cheat and deceive the naive public any longer.
Additionally it is time to Abolishing IRS, Moving towards a ‘Simple Flat Tax’ by instituting a “Flat Tax” nobody escapes paying. NOBODY! The way it’s laid out at the moment, the people always pay, but the lower classes pay nothing. In fact they get money back. Illegal aliens who have applied for ITIN’s, can collect child tax rebates, even though they never incurred any taxes. Read about tax fraud and the $7.6 billion dollars paid out by the IRS and remain unconcerned about this thievery.

2
179 comments
Jun 3, 2013, 5:19 pm
-0 +0

Yet by this method “Overstays” would be known and could be detained once caught. Overstays come in many forms such as pregnant women who are about to give birth, intentionally slipping past agents at the borders or airline check points then using our health care system in having that baby free of charge in most cases. They may go home, but many thousands remain have more children, with the deliberate opportunity for their child to become part of the system in a bad provision of the birthright citizenship act. Placing this as a momentous breakdown of the law, the cost of these children born to illegal aliens is hundreds of billions in your dollars annually and without an amendment will remain taxpayer’s problem for decades. This was the biometric visa system at ports of entry before granting permanent legal status to 11 million illegal immigrants. Sessions said a biometric system is necessary because 40 percent of illegal immigrants have overstayed their visas, and argued the Senate’s comprehensive immigration reform bill should not rely on a weaker biographic system using photographs.

So many amendments of creating strong enforcement at the border, operating a new state of the art Entry and Exit system was defeated as really was expected by most Americans who are frustrated by the money spent on illegal immigration. Say that the 1986 Immigration law was broken, but what they are trying to pass this as a better formula is CRAP. The Gang of Eight might have just reinvested their time, by just re-organizing and adding amendments to the law that was passed some 27 years ago. No! They didn’t want to do that? The G8 agenda was predicated on (as Americans see it) loosening laws to give the 11 million PLUS criminal illegal aliens a path to citizenship. There isn’t even any prohibition from the sponsoring of family Chain Migration? Once lawful, new ly recognized migrants and immigrants can bring in close family members, including old people who cannot fend for themselves and we will eventually be forced by law to support. THE WHOLE MANUFACURED LAW IS AN EXCUSE TO BRING IN EVEN MORE GUEST WORKERS, AND CHEAP SEMI-SKILLED WORKERS FOR INDUSTRY AND AGRICULTURE.

The Senate Gang of Eight immigration bill would offer a minimum of 33 million lifetime work permits in the first decade alone (11 million to current illegal immigrants, 11 million to new legal immigrants in a continuation of the current system, another 5 million chain migration relatives of immigrants who have applied but are waiting for their slot in other countries and 6 million new immigrants through new categories and expanded existing categories of immigration).  The 33 million in a single decade is almost half of all immigrants who have ever entered the U.S. in its history.  Meanwhile, federal reports show that 20 million Americans want a full-time job but cannot find one because too many people are looking for too few jobs. This disenfranchised population is disproportionately less educated (no college), disabled, veterans and Black and Hispanic Americans).  More than a thousand lobbyists for corporate special interests are pushing legislation to keep the U.S. labor market loose and to lower the wages of most U.S. workers, both foreign-born and U.S.-born.

3
179 comments
Jun 3, 2013, 5:21 pm
-0 +0

ALL AMENDMENTS OF ANY CONSEQUENCE WAS REJECTED BY SMUG SENATORS.

With the really tough TRIGGERS such as reintroducing the 2006 Secure Fence Act, placing it along the Southern border as double layer fencing and dressed topside with that razor wire found at the perimeters of prison compounds. This was already envisioned by Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, who constructed these two fences in his home county of San Diego and stretching it 14 miles.  But for all the promises and the enactment of the law, that was the only real barrier resurrected and had a 96 percent success rate of holding back en-mass illegal immigration. Supposedly another Trigger was to stop illegal aliens once receiving legal status would not be able to apply for any kind of public assistance, but the opposite is true. They can start picking out pocket when they gain a right to a resident permit. Of course that doesnt stop these people who have already skirted the law once, so stealing a persons Social Security number to gain a job is outrageous, especially now that both businesses that knowingly allowed these hires and the unauthorized workers who were hired. According to S.477 neither of these parties is to be prosecuted.  Another amendment that hit the dust, to even lax enforcement at the border and airline terminals is the Entry and Exit arrangement that was rejected. Any excuse from the Senators at the first Mark up by the judiciary committee, mostly dollars that they couldnt afford to fund this enforcement enhancement as strong as this deterrent.

4
318 comments
Jun 3, 2013, 8:58 pm
-0 +0

close the border now

5
318 comments
Jun 13, 2013, 11:54 am
-0 +0

Could anyone using the word Immigrant please differentiate between legal and illegal.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Todd Wiseman/Texas Tribune

Categories

news, politics & government, border, business, local, arizona, nation/world, breaking, Texas Tribune, mexico/latin america
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1764
  • Dylan Smith: 535
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 145
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Donate securely with PayPal

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

OR: Subscribe and stretch your donation over time

$5/mo. Printer's Devil
$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by