Sponsored by

Comments on

You’re fired! Trump repeats false claims about Obama's birth

If Donald Trump worked for us, we’d have to say: “Donald, you’re fired — for incompetence.” When it comes to getting facts straight, he fouls up again and again on the basics of President Obama’s birth. As a rookie reporter, he just wouldn’t make it.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

1
5 comments
Apr 11, 2011, 6:23 pm
-1 +0

Certification of Live Birth v. Birth Certificate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkCKReIBly0

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

FactCheck.org, says” FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.”
  We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. “

Then where are the photos of the “original birth certificate”?

Why did FactCheck.org only post a “prima facie copy”?

Can you accept the truth that FactCheck.org has committed wire fraud by implying they posted the original, while posting a “prima facie copy”?

Look at the back of Edith Coats’ Birth Certificate and look at Obama’s COLB.

Edith Coats Hawaii Longform 1962 #151- 62 - 08498
edith_front.jpg
edith_rear.jpg
http://passportsusa.com/?page_id=209

Edith Coats’ Birth Certificate is stamped on the rear:
“I CERTIFY THIS IS A TRUE COPY OF THE RECORD ON FILE IN THE HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH”“

Edith Coats has displayed a true copy of an original birth certificate, which contains public and confidential information.

Barack Obama’s COLB:
barack_rear.jpg

Barack Obama’s COLB is stamped on the rear:
“I CERTIFY THIS IS A TRUE COPY OR ABSTRACT OF THE RECORD ON FILE IN THE HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH”“
Obama displayed an abstract. Do you believe in Obama?

2
5 comments
Apr 11, 2011, 6:27 pm
-2 +0

1950The Statesman’s Yearbook 1950
http://www.archive.org/details/statesmansyearbo030477mbp

Kenya Colony and Protectorate 1938
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30311179/Colonial-Report-Annual-Kenya-Colony-and-Protectorate-1938
30311179-Colonial-Report-Annual-Kenya-Colony-and-Protectorate-1938.pdf
page 4 bottom paragraph mentions “consular jurisdiction”

1894 A Treatise on the Foreign Powers and Jurisdiction of the British Crown
http://books.google.com/books/download/A_treatise_on_the_foreign_powers_and_jur.pdf?id=1vqPAAAAMAAJ&hl=en&capid=AFLRE703VlN__gZO7PM7qo1meNiJAUIvLQ7HOibh8qMIstX1LBsHyOEdVk_6_LIbqA2VFowNLsRWFlMViZh3npt-2gF—DTIwg&continue=http://books.google.com/books/download/A_treatise_on_the_foreign_powers_and_jur.pdf?id=1vqPAAAAMAAJ&output=pdf&hl=en

Frame 40/344 page 20 Section 15 - Natural Born British Subjects
?action=view&current=A-treatise-pg20.png
Frame 41/344 page 21 Section 16 - Children and grandchildren born of British subjects outside the dominion of the Crown
?action=view&current=A-treatise-pg21.png

3
5 comments
Apr 11, 2011, 6:58 pm
-2 +0

1894 A Treatise on the Foreign Powers and Jurisdiction of the British Crown
http://bit.ly/gtLNf9

Frame 40/344 page 20 Section 15 - Natural Born British Subjects
?action=view&current=A-treatise-pg20-1.jpg


Frame 41/344 page 21 Section 16 - Children and grandchildren born of British subjects outside the dominion of the Crown
?action=view&current=A-treatise-pg21-1.jpg

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Trump speaks at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C.

Categories

news, politics & government, family/life, opinion, analysis, nation/world, breaking, FactCheck
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1352
  • Dylan Smith: 374
  • Roberto De Vido: 268
  • buddhaboy: 227
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 172
  • Joan: 86
  • scar: 83
  • janamg: 75
  • azjimn2son: 63
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you indepedent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Donate securely with PayPal

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

OR: Subscribe and stretch your donation over time

$5/mo. Printer's Devil
$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

TucsonSentinel.com is fiscally sponsored by the Investigative News Network. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews