- Radar van locations, traffic incidents & today's gas prices
- Live weather radar
- Photos: Thanksgiving in sanctuary
- Police & fire scanners
- Report road hazards, graffiti & other issues
- Supes OK count as Barber alleges ballots improperly rejected10
- McSally gets freshman orientation in DC as recount looms7
- Undocumented woman marks 100 days in sanctuary in Tucson church6
- Judge denies McSally move, says to continue counting Pima ballots6
- McSally walks back plan to bar press from election party6
Posted Nov 14, 2011, 10:14 am
Arizona's state Supreme Court released a ruling Monday, explaining why it let the recall election of now-ex Sen. Russell Pearce move forward.
The justices explained that "this Court has interpreted constitutional and statutory provisions governing recall liberally to protect the public’s right to recall its officials," given the legislative history of the recall provision.
The court shot down a suit to stop the recall election, dismissing claims that the petition-gathering process was flawed.
"The delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1910 were willing to risk statehood over a robust recall system that subjected every official to removal.... Adopting a standard that makes it more difficult for the public to remove its own officers would frustrate this historical intent. Seeing no reason to abandon 86 years of precedent and 100 years of commitment to popular recall" the court upheld a precedent that petitions must "substantially comply" with the legal standards.
The court further held that recall petitions need not lay out specific legal grounds for removing an officer.
"Voters may attempt to remove an officer for whatever reasons they choose," the decision said.
Pearce was removed from office last week, when voter in his Mesa district cast their ballots for conservative Republican Jerry Lewis by a margin of 12 percent.