- Hot topic: 'America's Hispanics'
- Early assessment of Common Core shows small gains
- ASU camera helps NASA pick out site for next Mars lander
- Second group files paperwork to seek 2016 vote on legalizing pot
- Wildcat soccer steps over UTEP 1-0
- Bill would create REAL ID-compliant licenses – if Arizonans pay for them7
- Legislature moves to block cities from banning plastic bags5
- City Hall fights transparency in manager search5
- Biggs finds supply-side economics embarrassing & dangerous4
- High court grills both sides in Arizona redistricting case4
Posted Nov 14, 2011, 10:14 am
Arizona's state Supreme Court released a ruling Monday, explaining why it let the recall election of now-ex Sen. Russell Pearce move forward.
The justices explained that "this Court has interpreted constitutional and statutory provisions governing recall liberally to protect the public’s right to recall its officials," given the legislative history of the recall provision.
The court shot down a suit to stop the recall election, dismissing claims that the petition-gathering process was flawed.
"The delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1910 were willing to risk statehood over a robust recall system that subjected every official to removal.... Adopting a standard that makes it more difficult for the public to remove its own officers would frustrate this historical intent. Seeing no reason to abandon 86 years of precedent and 100 years of commitment to popular recall" the court upheld a precedent that petitions must "substantially comply" with the legal standards.
The court further held that recall petitions need not lay out specific legal grounds for removing an officer.
"Voters may attempt to remove an officer for whatever reasons they choose," the decision said.
Pearce was removed from office last week, when voter in his Mesa district cast their ballots for conservative Republican Jerry Lewis by a margin of 12 percent.