Sponsored by

Note: This story is more than 3 years old.

Dems allege GOP supes candidate Bell got illegal campaign help

Tanner Bell, a Republican candidate for the Pima County Board of Supervisors, has benefited from improper coordination between political consultants and campaign committees, a complaint filed Friday by incumbent Democrat Sharon Bronson alleged.

The complaint, sent to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett and other officials, asked for an investigation into Bell's campaign, the "independent expenditure" committee Restoring Pride in Pima County, the nonprofit business league Arizonans for a Brighter Future, and TagLine Media Group, an advertising and political consulting firm.

Bell, who's seeking to end Bronson's 16-year tenure as a county supervisor for District 3, has benefited from what Democratic attorney Vince Rabago called "not just normal political shenanigans," Democrats said.

Rabago, who prepared the 13-page complaint for Bronson's campaign, said Friday that Bell has been helped by "outside dark money, and unregulated political committee activity."

Bronson's campaign manager, David Steele, said Bell has benefited from at least $23,000 spent by outside groups in support of his run for office. That was for just one TV ad buy, Steele said, saying there have been other ads and mailers as well.

"The claims are baseless," Bell said Friday afternoon, calling the complaint "a politically motivated, last-ditch effort to keep Sharon in office for 20 years."

Read the full complaint

Calls to Michael Farley, a developer who founded Arizonans for a Brighter Future, were not returned Friday.

Thanks to our donors and sponsors for their support of local independent reporting. Join Mark Myers, Alan Fischer, and Anna Mirocha and contribute today!

Deb Weisel, the owner of TagLine, dismissed the complaint.

"You can file a lawsuit against anyone you want," she said Friday afternoon. "There isn't a campaign that goes by that the Democrats don't file a lawsuit or complaint."

"We're honest to a fault," Weisel said, describing her firm as "just a vendor."

"It's like if we were a mailing house. Would it be wrong for the committee to use the same mailing house as Tanner?," she said.

TagLine was the subject of election-related complaints filed earlier this year by Republican candidates Mike Hellon and Stuart McDaniel and Democratic candidate Nancy Young-Wright.

The complaint filed by Bronson alleged that:

  • TagLine Media stopped working on Bell's campaign earlier this year to work for two pro-Bell groups, Arizonans for a Brighter Future and Restoring Pride in Pima County, violating laws that prohibit coordination between candidates and independent committees.
  • Bell owes over $3,700 to TagLine for prior work, which the complaint said means his campaign is not independent from the other groups the firm is working for, and that the extension of credit is an illegal campaign contribution.
  • Bell's failure to report the extension of credit as a contribution, despite the debt being listed on election filings, violates campaign finance laws.
  • Arizonans for a Brighter Future, which is incorporated in Delaware as a nonprofit 501c6 trade group, has violated Arizona laws by not registering to do business and not registering to solicit contributions in the state.
  • That ABF has violated federal law by focusing solely on supporting political candidates.
  • Restoring Pride in Pima County has not followed election law by failing to inform Bronson when sending our direct mail pieces naming her.

"The campaigns are not independent (as required by law)," Rabago said in an interview.

"Money spent by purportedly independent election committees is an in-kind contribution (to Bell)," he said.

Bell said he's had "absolutely zero" contact with TagLine since they dropped him as a client to work for Arizonans for a Brighter Future. He also said he's had no contact with the organizers of that group.

"I've met (Michael Farley) maybe once," he said. Bell said he didn't know why Farley's group was spending tens of thousands to support him, as the Democrats contend. Trade groups are allowed to spend money on lobbying, and a limited amount on candidates, but can't legally focus on supporting or defeating individual candidates without violating tax laws.

Thanks to our donors and sponsors for their support of local independent reporting. Join Meredith Aronson, Gawain Lavers, and Ken Paulin and contribute today!

Arizonans for a Brighter Future has not disclosed its donors.

Bell acknowledged owing money to TagLine, saying he's working to pay down the debt. He said he's had no contact with Weisel since TagLine stopped working on his campaign.

"Owing me money and me doing work for (Bell) are two very different things," Weisel said. "You know how it can be, trying to get people to pay you."

"It is what it is," Weisel said of the complaint. "I don't call the shots."

While Bell said the investigation request is "last-ditch," Rabago and Steele denied that the complaint is an "October Surprise."

"Putting all the stuff together took time," Rabago said. 

"It was filed when it was ready," Steele said in a Friday interview.

"The amount of coordination between the independent committees and the campaign itself is extraordinary in my view," Steele said.

"It's ham-handed and just wrong," he said, calling the alleged efforts by the groups "an attempt to evade election laws."

"If our elected officials took this stuff seriously, they'd get involved," Steele said. "But election laws and disclosure laws are not sexy stuff."

Rabago called the alleged activity the "toxic byproduct of Citizens United and Karl Rove-style politics."

"For democracy to work, everyone has to play by rules," Bronson, said in a news release. 'We cannot allow these shady groups and their big money backers to skirt the law. I am happy to do my part to see that they are stopped.'

Other connections

The legal complaint didn't include all of the connections between Bell and TagLine.

An "organizational chart" released Friday by the Pima County Democratic Party detailed the alleged relationships between the subjects of the complaint (see image in sidebar). The chart included an allegation that a TagLine employee, Christina Cruz, is being "laundered" through another company Weisel owns while she works on Bell's campaign.

Cruz, who some Democrats have described as now "working as the manager of the Vote Tanner Bell Campaign," worked on Bell's campaign for TagLine.

Cruz, who did not respond to a request for comment, is no longer an employee of TagLine, Weisel said. Instead, she works for car audio installer The Specialists — a business co-owned by Weisel and her husband.

Weisel said she doesn't know much about what she described as "my husband's business," but said that Cruz "does social media for some of my clients, mainly for The Specialists."

Thanks to our donors and sponsors for their support of local independent reporting. Join Mari Jensen, Loraine Zagula, and Roland Himmelhuber and contribute today!

Weisel said that Cruz doesn't do political work for Bell "on the Specialists' clock."

Bell said that Cruz "isn't my campaign manager, Sherry Potter is." Cruz "does some social media stuff for us, Facebook, etc.," he said.

Cruz's own social media pages — Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn — indicate she works for TagLine.

Bell's most recent campaign finance statement included $500 paid directly to Cruz for consulting work.

Another Internet-related connection between Bell and TagLine is his campaign website. Weisel is listed on Internet whois records as the administrative and technical contact for votetannerbell.com. TagLine is listed as the registrant.

Internet regulations require domain registration records to be kept up to date.

"I'm not 100 percent sure about the technical stuff," Bell said. "I know we can update the site without contacting (TagLine). Beyond that, I'm unsure about those issues."

- 30 -
have your say   

3 comments on this story

3
3 comments
Oct 27, 2012, 12:05 pm
-0 +0

Ah, yes.  You know what?  If I missed it chances are others may have as well.  That Roundtable session is so telling and relevant that it might as well be embedded in the body of the post.

This really feels like a concerted effort provide cover for Huckelberry (who’s longstanding reign is threatened by unseating Bronson).  I’d like to see what they are privately polling in Bronson’s district, because they don’t normally get dirty unless they are in trouble.  The Democratic party machine benefits as much from corruption as the more favored Republican land developers.  That’s why they pulled out of the lawsuit for prospective relief in rigged elections (which won an appellate decision).

The lawsuit filed two days ago is most definitely a newsworthy item that includes various candidates and Paul HIlts, the Pima County Democratic Party’s Election Integrity Chair.  It refers to specific state laws broken by the Pima Elections Division and is a bi-partisan effort to enforce the existing laws on behalf of election transparency before this upcoming general election.

Let me know if I can help you with contacts for the folks involved to interview or any supporting documents and information.

All local news outlets have reported nothing on this so far.

Thanks,

J.T.  Waldron
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

2
542 comments
Oct 27, 2012, 11:19 am
-0 +0

@InterceptMedia, You realize that video is in the sidebar of this report, right?

1
3 comments
Oct 26, 2012, 11:06 pm
-0 +0

Here is a link to an exchange that is very informative about this issue:

http://www.tucsonweekly.com/TheRange/archives/2012/10/26/political-roundtable-county-races-and-arizonans-for-a-brighter-future

Watch the interview with Huckelberry and Farley.  This story is a lot about protecting Huckelberry and, unfortunately, it’s a pretty loose example of the subject of money and politics, which should be treated seriously.  Huckelberry’s future is threatened by Bronson being unseated. 

Hate to say it, but the more substantive event to write about is the law suit by citizens against Pima County to enforce specific existing election laws before the general election:

http://weeklyintercept.blogspot.com/2012/10/arizona-citizens-sue-pima-county-to.html

Sometimes, what is omitted reveals more than what is reported.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click image to enlarge

Bell, in an undated photo from his campaign Facebook page.

Complaint vs. TagLine, Bell & committees

See a larger version of the complaint filed by Bronson's campaign.

Arizona Illustrated

Arizonans for a Brighter Future's Michael Farley and Pima County Democratic Party Chairman Jeff Rogers sparred Friday over the allegations of illegal help for Tanner Bell's campaign