Posted Oct 19, 2012, 6:27 pm
PHOENIX – Kathy Knecht, a governing board member in the Peoria Unified School District said counseling, says specialized reading and gifted student programs may be on the chopping block if voters don't approve Proposition 204.
Sue Skidmore, president of the Paradise Valley Unified School District Governing Board, says classroom sizes could suffer.
They were among several school board members who spoke at news conferences Thursday in Phoenix and Tucson in support of the measure, which would establish a 1 cent-per-dollar sales tax devoted primarily to funding education. A temporary sales tax voters approved in 2010 to support education funding is set to expire next May.
Their claims included the possibility that some schools would have to close.
Proposition 204, dubbed the Quality Education and Jobs Act by supporters, also would provide funding for transportation and human services. It would raise an estimated $1 billion a year.
Ann-Eve Pedersen, chairwoman of the proposition’s ballot committee, said that the state's economy depends on the ballot measure.
"If you want to have those professionals in your life that you depend on – good doctors, good nurses, good veterinarians, good accountants – they better have good places to send their kids to school," Pedersen said.
But Arizona State Treasurer Doug Ducey, chairman of No on 204, called the news conference "a new low" and "an act of desperation" that diverts attention from the measure's funding of special interest groups such as road contractors.
"It's a pork bill, and that's why they are conducting these desperate measures, because people know it's a pork bill," he said in a telephone interview.
Michael Hughes, president of the Arizona School Boards Association and a governing board member for Mesa Unified School District, dismissed that claim.
"I personally take offense by the reference of some that this is a blank check with no accountability," Hughes said.
Cuts among the arts, athletics and class electives are just a few areas at risk in Mesa, Hughes said. He also said it would be challenging for schools to meet state accountability requirements such as the new framework for teacher and principal evaluations.
"The potential result will be devastating to our entire school system," Hughes said.
Knecht from Peoria said the 1-cent tax has kept schools afloat amid cuts by the state Legislature and that its loss would be devastating to education.
"We can't rely on the state Legislature to be sympathetic and supportive of investing in education for Arizona school kids," Knecht in an interview.
Skidmore said class sizes are already strained in the Paradise Valley Unified School District. Senior English teachers, for example, are already expected to teach 40 students and evaluate 200 term papers.
"That is an impossible task to deliver," Skidmore said.
E.J. Perkins, a policy analyst with Arizona State University's Morrison Institute for Public Policy, described claims about school closures as as political bluster.
"While that's certainly a possibility, so are martians landing tomorrow," Perkins said. "If this thing fails ... I don't see any dramatic actions in that event."
Disclosure: Pedersen was a founding member of the Board of Directors of TucsonSentinel.com.
1 comment on this story
I say “No” to proposition 204.
The supporters of proposition 204 claim dire consequences if it fails. But more money is not the answer to poor education. We must assure that the money that already supports education is not wasted. And waste has reached huge, unprecedented levels. Corruption is rampant. And so is cronyism. All three stifle progress and make our education system wasteful and inefficient.
I propose the following. Forget any new taxes. Look at how the money is spent. Cut waste. Take on corruption. Eliminate cronyism. Eliminate bureaucracy. You may find that there is enough money for education.
I say “No” to proposition 204.