- Judge rules feds can try BP agent in Nogales cross-border shooting
- Live weather radar
- Police & fire scanners
- Varney to retire as Metro Chamber chief
- Lawsuit claims CBP officer sexually molested Guatemalan woman and 17-year-old sister
- A note to UA's new president: In my day, we didn't have 'safe places'7
- Lawyer: BP 'lost or destroyed' original video of Nogales cross-border shooting1
- Shafer withdraws as candidate for TUSD interim sup't1
- TUSD set to hire interim leaders after apparent open meeting law violation1
- JCPenney may close El Con store1
Posted Jul 15, 2012, 10:50 am
Arizona police agencies said the loss of a state-federal partnership might not be the critical blow to immigration law enforcement that some had feared.
After the Department of Homeland Security announced June 25 that it was ending its 287(g) task force agreements in Arizona, politicians warned that the move would put state residents in “grave danger.”
But of the seven agencies in the state that had task force agreements under 287(g), three said they do not expect to be affected by the loss of the program and three others said it is too early to tell.
“There is no effect for the Pima County Sheriff’s Department for 287(g),” said Deputy Tom Peine, a department spokesman.
The program was created by Immigration and Customs Enforcement to let local police perform federal immigration enforcement functions, if the officers took training. It also gave local departments access to a federal database where they could check the immigration status of suspects.
The Arizona Department of Public Safety became a 287(g) partner in 2007, followed over the next two years by departments in Mesa, Phoenix and Florence and the counties of Pima, Pinal and Yavapai.
But the government announced that it was ending the program in Arizona on June 25, the same day that the Supreme Court upheld a critical part of the state’s SB 1070 law that lets police check the immigration status of people they have arrested.
“ICE has determined that 287(g) Task Force agreements are not useful in states that have adopted immigration enforcement laws like SB 1070,” the Department of Homeland Security said in announcing the change.
TucsonSentinel.com relies on contributions from our readers to support our reporting on Tucson's civic affairs. Donate to TucsonSentinel.com today!
If you're already supporting us, please encourage your friends, neighbors, colleagues and customers to help support quality local independent journalism.
ICE officials said they will continue to work in other ways with Arizona police, such as checking the citizenship status of someone in state custody if police call and ask.
The change did not affect a jail enforcement portion 287(g), under which correctional officers can perform federal enforcement functions. The agency also continues to run a similar program, Secure Communities, under which police across the state can send fingerprints to the federal government to check a suspect’s criminal background and immigration status.
ICE did not end its 287(g) partnerships in 23 other states, only in Arizona.
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court decision and the ICE announcement, many politicians charged the Obama administration with singling out Arizona for retribution.
“President Obama has demonstrated anew his utter disregard for the safety and security of the Arizona people,” Gov. Jan Brewer said in a statement on the day of the announcement.
In a letter two days later to ICE Director John Morton, four members of the state’s congressional delegation said the “current course of action puts Arizona citizens in grave danger.” The June 27 letter, signed by Republican Reps. Paul Gosar, Trent Franks, David Schweikert and Ben Quayle, called 287(g) a “critical public safety tool” and called on Morton to reinstate it.
In a separate statement at the time, Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Mesa, said suspending 287(g) in Arizona “will strip our local authorities of critical tools to deal with illegal immigration.”
But several weeks later, local police do not appear too concerned.
Mesa Police spokesman Sgt. Tony Landato said the department did have one officer with 287(g) training, but had to pull him off those duties for budget reasons. Sheriff’s department officials in Pima and Yavapai counties also said they expected little fallout from the program’s termination.
Other departments – those that tended to have more 287(g)-trained officers – said they were in wait-and-see mode.
Support TucsonSentinel.com & let thousands of daily readers know
your business cares about creating a HEALTHIER, MORE INFORMED Tucson
“It has the potential to impact our day to day enforcement efforts,” said Pinal County Sheriff’s Office spokesman Elias Johnson. “But we’re going to sit back and see on what that impact will be, instead of speculating.”
Pinal County had 22 officers trained under 287(g) and the Arizona Department of Public Safety had 28. Phoenix officials could not immediately say how many officers they had trained under the program. But all three agencies said it’s too early to tell what effect the end of the program will have.
Police in Florence, the sevenths department with a 287(g) agreement, could not be reached for comment on the impact of the change.
Those wait-and-see agencies did express concern that there might come a time when they have to release an undocumented alien if ICE does not respond to calls to come take the person into federal custody.
But ICE said that its Enforcement and Removal Operations office has received a “normal volume of requests from state and local law enforcement agencies” in recent weeks. The Phoenix office said it received eight calls between June 25 and July 2 that resulted in the arrest of 38 people for immigration violations.
Still, some elected officials said they would rather have the program than not.
“We’re not suggesting that 287(g) is a silver bullet, but it’s another arrow in the quiver of local law enforcement,” said Genevieve Rozansky, a press aide to Flake.
Gosar said Friday he stands by the letter “raising a red flag about the retaliatory actions of this administration.”
“These valuable partnerships to enforce securing our border and protect the residents of Arizona are a valuable part of a comprehensive plan to strengthen our communities,” he said in a statement, adding that canceling 287(g) shows “a disregard for the people of our great state.”
TucsonSentinel.com's original reporting and curation of border and immigration news is generously supported in part by a grant from the Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation.