Sponsored by

Report: Focus on border security overshadows economic benefits

Thanks to

WASHINGTON – Rep. Raul Grijalva, D- Tucson, knows there are benefits to be had from a U.S.-Mexico relationship, but fears the possibilities have been endangered by the hostility that has become part of the immigration debate.

“The border lines went from a unique American landscape of people, history, and land itself, to a threat … to something to be feared,” Grijalva said. “Making that transition has affected the border tremendously.”

His remarks came last week at the release of a report that highlighted the many economic benefits that Mexico provides neighboring states, including Arizona – benefits that the authors said most Americans do not realize.

“I think there’s a giant awareness gap (about) what kind of country Mexico is and what it means to have a good, or a better, relationship with Mexico,” said Erik Lee, one of the authors of “The State of the Border Report,” which was released Thursday.

“It’s the 12th-largest economy in the world,” said Lee, associate director of the North American Center for Transborder Studies at Arizona State University.

The report – prepared jointly by the center, the Woodrow Wilson Center and El Colegio de la Frontera Norte – cited a 2007-2008 University of Arizona study that said Mexican visitors generated more than 30,000 jobs in Arizona that year, leading to more than $2.6 billion in revenue.

Despite benefits like that, Lee said policymakers’ overemphasis on national security is causing grave harm to our relationship with Mexico. That has been particularly true in Arizona, which has seen a hardening of the border in recent years.

“Arizona has really witnessed a buildup in border patrol,” Lee said. As a result, he said, the state “really has underperformed in terms of its trade with Mexico.”

Like what you're reading? Support high-quality local journalism and help underwrite independent news without the spin.

The report said the U.S. Border Patrol now has more than 21,000 agents assigned to Southwest border sectors, a more than 500 percent increase in staffing since the early 1990s. The resulting spike in arrests, besides deterring illegal immigration, has also dissuaded the many migrant workers who would typically have come from Mexico, Lee said.

An improved relationship could be beneficial to the quality of life on both sides of the border, Lee said, but the ongoing immigration debate could make or break Arizona’s relationship with Mexico.

“We’re at a really historical moment,” Lee said.

Grijalva agreed, saying the benefits outlined in the report deserve “to be part of the discussions as we go forward.”

“These studies provide a groundwork … where we reintroduce the good aspects of what a border line should be,” he said.

“This (report) is trying to redefine, redirect, and refocus the conversation about the border lines … to talk about economics, to talk about opportunity, and what is possible in the border community,” Grijalva said.

Lee said that in addition to economic advantages – he said Arizona’s “two-way trade with Mexico is about $13 billion a year” – a solid cross-border business relationship would help border security.

But economics are only one part of the potential advantages, according to the report, which also looked at the sustainability and competitiveness issues that the border provides to the two countries.

Lee said the report will be given to policymakers as immigration talks continue and he hopes they look at the positives as they go forward instead of just focusing on security.

“On one hand I think Americans should know a lot more about Mexico than they do,” Lee said. “But on the other hand it’s a large, complex picture.”

TucsonSentinel.com's original reporting and curation of border and immigration news is generously supported in part by a grant from the Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation.

- 30 -
have your say   

1 comment on this story

1
1517 comments
May 28, 2013, 7:20 am
-0 +1

Grijalva is an idiot, but I already knew that.

The buildup in border patrol does not interfere with a single dime of legal trade across the border.

As to the Mexican nationals who come here to spend money and leave…they know they’re welcome by most here and won’t be harassed. Those are the Mexican nationals we want, those who come here, spend a bunch of money, and leave.

This is just Grijalva trying to spin his open border agenda in a vain attempt to make it look like something legit. I am anxiously waiting for the day when the so-called voters in his district stop being stupid and actually care enough about their community to vote this idiot out.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click image to enlarge

Nela Lichtscheidl/Cronkite News Service

Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson, said 'The State of the Border Report' shows possible border benefits, not just the negatives that are often highlighted. He is with Andrew Selee of the Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute at the release of the report.

Up on the border

Highlights of “The State of the Border Report,” a comprehensive look at the state of the Southwest border:

  • The U.S. is Mexico’s top trading partner; Mexico is the United States’ No. 3 partner in terms of total trade.
  • Mexicans are the second-largest group of visitors to the U.S. each year and account for the fourth-highest spending by a tourist group, at $8.7 billion, behind Canada, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
  • Mexico is the No. 1 foreign destination for U.S. tourists.
  • U.S. imports from Mexico contain an average of 40 percent U.S. content, and Mexican imports from the U.S. come over with a high level of Mexican content.
  • In 2011, U.S.-Mexican trade in goods and services reached a half-trillion dollars.
  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews