Sponsored by

Note: This story is more than 3 years old.

Senate immigration plan: No path to citizenship without secure border

There will be a path to citizenship for immigrants in this country illegally but not before the border is secure, under a bipartisan Senate bill expected to be filed this week.

An outline of the immigration reform bill proposed by the so-called “Gang of 8″ calls for billions more for border security, changes in visa laws, stricter enforcement of laws against hiring illegal immigrants and a pathway to lawful residence in 10 years and, later, citizenship.

Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., two of the eight senators who have worked on the proposal for the past two months, briefed President Barack Obama on the bill Tuesday.

“This bill is clearly a compromise, and no one will get everything they wanted, including me,” Obama said in a statement after the meeting. “But it is largely consistent with the principles that I have repeatedly laid out for comprehensive reform.”

He called on the Senate to move quickly on the bill, which is expected to be filed Wednesday and heard Friday by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Republicans have insisted that the border be secure before any pathway to citizenship is opened for the 11 million people in the country illegally.

The bill defines a secure border as one where 90 percent of the people who cross illegally in a high-risk sector – one where more than 30,000 people cross each year – are caught or turned back.

Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson, supports a pathway to citizenship but said requiring a secure border first is tough for him to swallow.

Support TucsonSentinel.com today, because a smarter Tucson is a better Tucson.

“If there are triggers attached that say, ‘We will not move on this path unless…,’ then I’m uncomfortable and not supportive, and I think a lot of other people will be too,” Grijalva said Tuesday on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal.”

But the outline describes several triggers.

Within 180 days of the bill’s approval, the Department of Homeland Security would have to present Congress a comprehensive border security plan as well as a plan for fencing along the southern border.

Once that is accomplished, people here illegally could apply for “registered provisional immigrant” status in this country.

Next, the department would have to implement those security plans, put a mandatory employment-verification system in place and establish an electronic exit system at air and sea ports of entry. At that point, registered provisional immigrants could begin the process of applying for lawful residency.

To apply for registered provisional status, an immigrant would have to have been in the United States by Dec. 31, 2011, pay a $500 penalty, be assessed taxes and pay an application fee. Those who had committed felonies or three misdemeanors would not be eligible.

Spouses or parents of U.S. citizens, legal residents or those eligible for the DREAM Act – generally people who were brought here illegally as children – could also apply for registered provisional status even if they had been deported for non-criminal reasons.

People facing deportation would also be allowed to apply.

The window to apply would be one year, although the Homeland Security secretary could extend that to two years. Once granted, registered provisional status would last six years and could be renewed, with an additional $500 fee.

Ten years after getting registered provisional status, immigrants could apply for legal permanent residence, but only if all those people awaiting a green card at the time the law is passed have gotten through the system.

Thanks to our donors and sponsors for their support of local independent reporting. Join Kayla Boyer, Kilian Metcalf, and Steve Elliott and contribute today!

Legal permanent residence is still several years from applying for citizenship.

The bill makes exceptions for DREAMers and those here on agricultural immigration programs. Both could bet legal permanent residence in five years, and DREAMers could apply for citizenship immediately after they get their so-called green cards.

Regina Jefferies, head of the Arizona chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said she is encouraged by the outline of the bill. She called the time frame reasonable, and said the expedited process for DREAMers is a good addition that recognizes their particular circumstances.

Jefferies is concerned about the call for border security and said it will be important to make sure the money – at least $4.5 billion – is spent wisely.

“We have to make sure we’re not just throwing money at the border,” she said. “We’ve already spent lots and lots of money on the border.”

The bill calls for $3 billion for extra customs and border patrol officers, for manned and unmanned aircraft and other surveillance and detection systems on the southern border. It would also put $1.5 billion toward the southern border fence, including double-layer fencing, infrastructure and technology.

If the 90 percent effectiveness rate is not reached on the southern border within five years, a commission would be set up to analyze the situation and recommend ways to reach that goal. Another $2 billion could be appropriated to implement those recommendations.

Jefferies recommended that everyone take a deep breath and review the bill. This is just the beginning of the debate, she said.

“Remember that this is a process that’s going to take a while,” Jefferies said. “There’s no law yet.”

- 30 -
have your say   

3 comments on this story

3
9 comments
Apr 17, 2013, 11:59 am
-0 +0

Our Government doing something what a novel idea! Great job Jeff Flake! I like that the DHS has to perform of lose the duty to perform border protection. We have Napolitano telling us everything is secure while the reports show that over 60% of the Illegal crossers are making it into the USA, they get to the USA they are sick, they use Arizona resources until they move on to the larger cities who give them a safe haven and jobs, without any of the cost burden placed on the border States. A program that allows workers to cross legally, without coyotes and drugs strapped to their backs!

This isn’t perfect but waiting for perfection is politics as usual nothing gets do
ne!

Thank you!

William Robert Heath Sr.

2
542 comments
Apr 17, 2013, 10:16 am
-0 +0

Sorry, @Bret, but you’re mistaken. Not everything that is a violation of a law or regulation is a crime. It’s not a crime to go 5 miles over the speed limit, nor are most immigration violations against a criminal statute or so sayeth the highest court:

“As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain in the United States.” Chief Justice John Roberts, Arizona v. United States.

1
1768 comments
Apr 17, 2013, 9:50 am
-0 +0

Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson, supports a pathway to citizenship but said requiring a secure border first is tough for him to swallow.

Duh…a secure border is the last thing in the world Grijalva wants. Where are his voters going to come from then?

DHS chief Fred Flinstone has been saying that the border has been secure for years. I certainly hope we don’t count on him.her to make the determination as to when it actually is secure.

...been deported for non-criminal reasons.

I hate this term. When the hell is the AP style book or whatever the hell it is finally going to address this? Let me help you out…

Entering this country illegally is a crime. Hence the term “illegally” meaning “against the law”. Those who break the law are committing crimes. Those who commit crimes are criminals. Therefore, all border jumpers are criminals. You got a problem with that? Don’t be hatin’ on me, take it up with the authors of the dictionary.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click image to enlarge

Connor Radnovich/Cronkite News Service

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., at podium with three of the other 'Gang of 8' senators in January: From left, Dick Durbin, D-Ill., John McCain, R-Ariz., and Bob Menendez, D-N.J.

Path to the pathway

A bipartisan Senate immigration reform bill set several criteria before immigrants here could begin the long process of getting legal residence here, including:

  • Immigrants cannot apply for “registered provisional immigrant” status until the secretary of Homeland Security submits plans to Congress for comprehensive border security and for improving the southern fence.
  • Immigrants cannot apply for lawful permanent residence – green cards – until: the border and fence security plans are substantially complete; a mandatory employment-verification system is implemented; and an electronic exit system at air and sea ports of entry is in place.