Posted Feb 2, 2012, 11:15 pm
The White House was on the defensive Thursday over its requirement that church-affiliated employers cover birth control after House Speaker John Boehner called the order unconstitutional.
As part of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul law, health insurers along with non-profit religious employers such as hospitals, colleges and charities must provide free birth control to women.
Most insurers must meet the requirement by Aug. 1, while qualified non-profit religious groups have another year to comply.
Churches and houses of worship do not have to follow the new rule, released nearly two weeks ago.
Critics of the directive — mainly Catholic and Protestant evangelical leaders — say it infringes on freedom of religion.
And the resulting wave of protests have "clearly taken administration officials by surprise" and may be "politically risky for Obama in a close election year," the Associated Press wrote.
However, the Wall Street Journal cited White House press secretary Jay Carney as saying Thursday that the administration had no plans to reverse course on its decision.
“The decision has been made, and it was made after careful consideration,” he told a regular briefing.
TucsonSentinel.com relies on contributions from our readers to support our reporting on Tucson's civic affairs. Donate to TucsonSentinel.com today!
If you're already supporting us, please encourage your friends, neighbors, colleagues and customers to help support quality local independent journalism.
According to the WSJ, the White House also published a blog post by Cecilia Munoz, director of the House Domestic Policy Council, pointing out that "no individual health care provider will be forced to prescribe contraception” and “no individual will be forced to buy or use contraception."
Boehner, meantime, a Catholic, was quoted by the AP as saying Thursday: "I think this mandate violates our Constitution. I think it violates the rights of these religious organizations. And I would hope that the administration would back up and take another look at this."
2 comments on this story
The term “free” is a little questionable. If it means ‘at no extra cost beyond the premiums the insured is already paying’ then that is reasonable. I don’t think Catholic hospitals should have the right to turn away a patient in need of birth control, so I generally support this measure.
This administration will not be satisfied until it infringes in every aspect of American life. We the people are pretty stupid and the White House must guide us through every turn. Hang on folks. If we get 4 more years with the sheriff of Nottingham, there is no telling what edicts shall be rung down on the peasantry. The King (George Soros} must already be licking his chops.