- Radar van locations, traffic incidents & today's gas prices
- Police & fire scanners
- What they're saying about TucsonSentinel.com
- Live weather radar
- Freezing Arizona: Cold temp watch for Tucson
- Varney: What's Plan B after bond defeat?11
- Despite GOP lawsuit, judge's ruling seems to favor city-wide elections9
- Message to GOP: Play the game before you claim you are victims of it9
- Tucson leaders need professional help after bond losses3
- GOP Council candidates won East Side, still lost in landslides3
Posted Feb 1, 2013, 5:45 pm
Saying he’s tired of dealing with faulty parking meters and hearing the same concern from constituents, a Phoenix lawmaker wants to require cities to test and repair their meters on a schedule set by state law.
“This bill is aimed at doing one thing, and that is trying to protect the residents and the businesses in downtown Phoenix from losing their money to parking meters and making sure the meters are working correctly,” said Rep. Chad Campbell, D-Phoenix, the House minority leader.
Campbell authored HB 2086, which would require to test 10 percent of parking meters every three months. If fewer than 75 percent of meters are functioning properly, a city would have to test and calibrate all of its meters.
As long meters are below that 75 percent threshold, anyone who receives a parking ticket could get an exemption from having to pay.
The bill won unanimous approval from the House Government Committee on Jan. 22 and was awaiting action on the floor.
Such a state law has precedent: Pennsylvania, for example, requires cities and towns to test their parking meters every five years.
Campbell said that last year he tried to use a parking meter in Phoenix, but it didn’t accept his coins. When he called the city of Phoenix to report it, he said someone reported writing down his complaint and pledging to take care of it. Upon returning to his car a few hours later, however, he said he found a parking ticket.
“I’ve heard for years that we’re going to replace these parking meters, we’re going to update them with new ones, they’re going to take debit cards … and we’re here in 2013 and nothing has been changed,” Campbell said.
TucsonSentinel.com relies on contributions from our readers to support our reporting on Tucson's civic affairs. Donate to TucsonSentinel.com today!
If you're already supporting us, please encourage your friends, neighbors, colleagues and customers to help support quality local independent journalism.
Ken Strobeck, executive director of the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, said Campbell is taking the wrong approach to reform.
“This plays into the perception that every solution for every problem is more state laws, and I think that this is certainly something that we can try to work out on a city level,” Strobeck said.
Rep. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, a member of the House Government Committee, voted to advance the bill but said he was concerned that it only applies to the few Arizona cities that have parking meters.
“I’d love to see something specific to a few cities be addressed at a city level,” Petersen said.
Sina Matthes, public information officer for Phoenix, said the city already has a parking meter maintenance process in place and checks more than 10 percent of meters every three months. If the bill becomes law, she said, the city may be forced to reallocate resources in the Parking Meter Section.
“We believe that our parking meter staff is doing a great job at managing the aspects of our parking meter operations,” Matthes said.