Comments on 'Downtown facades: Old bricks get restored glitz'
Sponsored by

Comments on

Downtown facades: Old bricks get restored glitz

Long home to the Chicago Store, for years now the century-old building at Congress and 6th Avenue has looked anything but regal, with boarded-up windows on its upper floor and a deteriorating exterior. But now the building is getting a facelift thanks to a grant from the city’s Downtown Facade Improvement Program, which focuses on preserving historic buildings.... Read more»

have your say   

9 comments on this story

Dec 6, 2012, 6:53 pm
-0 +1

Glad our tax dollars are being used to protect your investment, Fregonese.

Dec 6, 2012, 8:02 pm
-0 +0

Wow, I never thought I’d say this, but finally money is being spent downtown for a productive purpose. just typing that out felt weird!

The Chicago Store has long been a staple of downtown, and provides goods that actually enrich our community. Due to their loyalty to the community, and the longevity of not just their business but being in the same location, I think that they’re very worthy of this windfall.

I am hoping that the look and the feel of the building will stay the same.

Dec 6, 2012, 8:40 pm
-0 +0

Surly - he used $100,000 of HIS own money to help protect his investment along with the $100,000 he received for the project. This is much more than just someone throwing money around. This is something that was sorely needed. The revitalization continues in leaps and bounds. As someone who works downtown, I’m glad to see these projects happening.

Dec 6, 2012, 8:45 pm
-0 +0

he wanted the grant… to protect his investment.  Read the quote.

Dec 6, 2012, 8:48 pm
-0 +0

Well of course he wanted to protect his investment!! What business wouldn’t? With him being in a historic building, it made perfect sense. I don’t begrudge him one dollar of that grant.

Dec 6, 2012, 8:54 pm
-0 +1

@Bret Linden,

The facade grant program isn’t something new. Previous grantees include the Beowulf Alley Theatre, The Screening Room, the Rialto Building, and other locations downtown.

Dec 7, 2012, 8:55 am
-0 +0

@Dylan Smith

Well, I am aware the facade thing has been going on for a few years now.  Though I am slightly familiar with the Beowulf and the Screening room, I am not familiar enough to speak intelligently about those two.

The Rialto on the other hand…I like the Rialto. It has character, and good acoustics (not great) for concerts. I’ve been to many concerts there, most of which have been sell outs. However, the thing has been a money pit for tax dollars over the last decade or so. I cringe at the though of that place being given even one more tax dollar. Biggers or whatever moron runs that place now…if they can’t be self-sufficient with all the sell out concerts they put on there, then they’re idiots and shouldn’t be running anything.

The Chicago Store, on the other hand, is “anti-Downtown”. What I mean by “anti-Downtown” is that, unlike most other entities having something to do with downtown, they’ve seem to have done everything right. Same name, same location, same business. They’ve been there for at least 30 years that I know about. When Tucsonans decided they’d rather shop at the malls instead of Downtown, the Chicago store has always found a way to survive and keep going in the same location, without constant whining and panhandling like other so-called businesses down there have done over the course of my lifetime.

As I stated before, unlike a lot of other things downtown the Chicago Store actually provides something productive and useful for our community. They’re one of the few places that I would miss if they ever had to close. So, I’m with Mel B here…I too do not begrudge them one dollar of that grant.

Dec 7, 2012, 9:06 am
-0 +0

@Bret Linden,

AFAIK, the Rialto Theatre has never received any money from the facade grant program. The structure adjoining it, the Rialto Building/Rialto Block, did. Different owners, different building.

Biggers stepped down from his position at the theatre about a year ago.

Dec 7, 2012, 9:20 am
-0 +0

The Rialto is part of the Rio Nuevo Multipurpose Facilities District so that’s where the renovation money came from. They didn’t get any money from the Downtown Tucson Partnership Facade program.

Curtis McCrary is the Executive Director/GM now, according to their website.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Dylan Smith/

Old familiar signs and tattered murals gone, downtown's Chicago Store is getting a $200,000 facelift under a city program providing matching grants to preserve facades.


news, politics & government, business, downtown, history, trans/growth, local, arizona, breaking, Cronkite News
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 541
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 153
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by


I want to help offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below) is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves. does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.


Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by