Sponsored by

Comments on

Occupy Tucson arrests up after police change tactics

Tucson Police arrested 34 Occupy Tucson demonstrators Tuesday night after changing their enforcement tactics to cite everyone remaining at Veinte de Agosto Park after dark, instead of allowing protesters to leave before issuing tickets to those who refuse to go.... Read more»

have your say   

4 comments on this story

1
1768 comments
Nov 23, 2011, 7:54 pm
-9 +2

@dregstudios

You’re stupid. You’ve protested, you’ve been heard, now it’s over. Go home. What about the rest of the community’s right to not have their parks loaded with bums?

2
1768 comments
Nov 24, 2011, 10:46 pm
-2 +1

This is over, has been for a while…

You’re not going to find a more passionate advocate of first-amendment rights than me. It’s every American’s right to make a complete ass out of himself!

However, I am just not seeing what living in the park for two months and free speech have to do with one another. The flea party shouted its disorganized and inarticulate message. We all heard it. Now we all should be moving on. The 99% of us who think the flea party are idiots already have moved on. Time for the flea party to accept reality, pack their bags, and move on to something more productive…like taking a shower.

3
2 comments
Nov 25, 2011, 7:09 pm
-0 +2

How unfortunate that the police waste time and taxpayer’s money on something as innocuous as camping in a public park. I cannot for the life of me see what public harm the protesters are doing by making an issue that really DOES encompass the majority of the population public, when the media can only snidely mention it, if at all. The protesters’ views are quite widespread, and yet the only way they have been able to gain any traction was to occupy public space. (Some later comment will have to deal with how one “occupies” what already belongs to the public, and why one should have to…..)  I just don’t see the danger in that and I just don’t see why the police is getting in such a swivet about it. I appreciate the protesters’ presence and feel honored to live in a city with people who care as much as they do.

4
1 comments
Nov 26, 2011, 7:40 am
-0 +1

First Amendment to the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances.

It seems to me that any Government restricting peaceable assembly to small parcels of public space called “free speech zones” is an abridgement of both free speech and the right to peaceably assemble.

If the fine for assembling and freely speaking outside of “free speech zones” is set at $1,000, what then should be the sentence of rogue government officials who rob people of their Constitutional Rights everywhere but the ever-shrinking “Constitutional zones” arbitrarily specified by them?

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Categories

news, politics & government, business, crime & safety, downtown, local, arizona, breaking

Tags

Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 151
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by