Sponsored by

Comments on

Supes OK count as Barber alleges ballots improperly rejected

The Pima County Board of Supervisors rejected Tuesday a bid by Ron Barber to delay the canvass of the Nov. 4 election. The congressman's campaign — on the losing edge of a 161-vote margin with a recount in the offing — said that 132 Pima voters had their ballots tossed out because poll workers "failed in their duty."... Read more»

have your say   

10 comments on this story

1
1768 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 9:24 am
-1 +1

As I previously said, I believe Barber is a man of low character. However, I have to admit he may have some valid points here.

First off, the fact that these slow-count situations happen at all in the year 2014 show that there are serious problems in the recorder’s office/elections department/whatever that border on dysfunction.

But, I can tell you that I have experienced some of the problems mentioned in this story first-hand. In the ‘12 election, I was forced to vote via provisional ballot because the poll worker couldn’t find my name on the roster. Yes, my vote was eventually counted, but it took about a week for that to finally happen.

The other time was the special election where Barber should have lost to Jesse Kelly. For whatever reason, my wife and I were directed to a polling place that was a good four-mile drive from our home at the time, and I counted three other polling places that I drove by on the way to my “correct” polling place. After the election, I walked in to the Elections Department to complain. They admitted to me that there were mistakes made when it came to polling places. But, maybe they didn’t learn from those mistakes.

Because of my own first-hand experiences, when it comes to confusion over polling places I am far more inclined to side with the confused voter rather than the recorder/elections department/whatever.

All of that said, I’m not sure how this would change fortunes for Barber. He’s losing by 161 votes. This piece says that 130 residents had their voting rights “violated”. Even if he is correct, and all 130 of those people ended up voting for Barber, that still wouldn’t put him over the top by my math.

2
343 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 9:33 am
-2 +2

Count all the votes…The fact that McSleazy can’t wait to be crowned and ignore the fact that long time voters have been denied their votes…She will not represent all voters in the district…witness the fact that she was endorsed by local racists like Roy Warden and nationwide teaparty extremists like Allen West…

3
1768 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 3:49 pm
-4 +1

Cactus Dave said:

...she was endorsed by local racists like Roy Warden and nationwide teaparty extremists like Allen West…

Barber was endorsed by Adelita Grijalva, daughter of a former mecha member and probably the biggest racist in this entire state.

4
343 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 4:08 pm
-2 +3

Brett you are almost as big a racist as Warden judging by your comments in the past… If you dislike Hispanics so much I suggest you move…

5
1768 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 4:09 pm
-2 +2

I meant Adelita’s father is the biggest racist in this entire state. I’m of course referring to the shambefully-reelected Raul Grijalva.

6
1768 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 4:13 pm
-1 +3

Cactus Dave wrote:

Brett you are almost as big a racist as Warden judging by your comments in the past… If you dislike Hispanics so much I suggest you move…

So, let me fill in the other baseless insults you’re hurl from the liberal-extremists handbook, to save you the trouble:

angry
uncivil
vitirolic
hateful
mean-spirited

There, I said them so you don’t have to. You’re welcome…though there wasn’t much to it, as your type is so painfully predictable.

Let me explain something to you that apparently no one has ever tried to before: A racist judges/hates someone based on the color of their skin. A racist is not someone that might just happen to have an opinion that differs from your own.

7
343 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 4:33 pm
-1 +2

More redbaiting…why don’t you just post your membership card from the John Birch Society you mindless idiot

8
1768 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 4:37 pm
-2 +2

Cactus Dave asserted:

More redbaiting…why don’t you just post your membership card from the John Birch Society you mindless idiot

I’m apparently even more mindless than you give me credit for, because I have no idea what “redbaiting” is, and I don’t have the first damn clue who John Birch or Allen West are. I could Google them, but I’m just not that interested, in all honesty. I will say that if they’re thorns in the side of someone like you, then they must be pretty good guys.

9
343 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 5:43 pm
-2 +2

If you don’t know who they are than you your comments are more uninformed than I thought…

10
1768 comments
Nov 19, 2014, 9:40 pm
-2 +2

Cactus Dave asserted:

If you don’t know who they are than you your comments are more uninformed than I thought…

Well, if this is how you feel then you should have no desire to read any more of my posts, let alone respond to them, in the future.

You, on the other hand, have never left an intelligent comment here, you have never made a point (let alone a good one), you have never cited a reference, you haven’t even stated a fact, really. All you ever do is hurl baseless, outlandish insults toward the subject of a story, or to someone commenting in response to it. As best I can tell, each and every one of your comments left here has been based on assumptions of facts not in evidence. This is why I have never taken you seriously, and I very highly doubt that anyone else here ever has, either.

All your comments to date have been a complete waste of your time and the Sentinel’s bandwidth. If you had any brains or any pride you would be thoroughly embarrassed by each and every one of them.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Dylan Smith/TucsonSentinel.com

Barber on election night.

Categories

news, politics & government, local, arizona, nation/world, breaking, Cronkite News
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 150
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by