Sponsored by

Comments on

4 cited at Occupy Tucson overnight

Tucson police cited 4 Occupy Tucson demonstrators for remaining in a downtown park after closing time overnight, a department spokeswoman said. There have been over 580 arrests since the protest began Oct. 15.... Read more»

have your say   

10 comments on this story

Nov 16, 2011, 7:08 pm
-2 +1

I bet the flea party stinks something fierce. Where are these people pooping? Where are they showering? Where are they shaving? (Well, the men. We all know women of this ilk don’t shave).

Nov 16, 2011, 9:52 pm
-0 +1

They have several porta-potty’s and food service area has passed health inspection (with compliments). Why don’t you show up and educate yourself?

Nov 16, 2011, 10:08 pm
-1 +0

I’ve been tempted to show up just for curiousity’s sake, but I aint drinking your kool-aid. You blame the wrong people…

Nov 16, 2011, 10:12 pm
-1 +1

It’s not about blaming anyone. It’s frustrations with the current system that’s broken. That’s why “demands” haven’t been made.

Nov 17, 2011, 6:19 am
-0 +1


Not blaming anyone? IF you’re saying things are broken, how in the world do you expect anyone to fix it if you’re not even going to hold anyone accountable for what you say is broken?

And you wonder why guys like me can’t take your movement seriously…

Nov 17, 2011, 1:52 pm
-1 +1

The idea is not to produce more patches and bandaids rather than addressing real problems at the root. That takes more than being reactionary. I think everyone agrees that corporations are not people and they have too much influence in politics. The first step is waking people up to DO something.

Nov 17, 2011, 3:18 pm
-0 +1

I think everyone agrees that corporations are not people and they have too much influence in politics.

I will wholeheartedly agree that corporations are not people. However, you’re placing the blame in the wrong place. If I pay you to punch someone in the face, and you do it, is that on you or on me? I don’t blame corporate interests for making politicians corrupt, I blame politicians for making politicians corrupt.

The first step is waking people up to DO something.

Yes, I like this quote, and have thought it myself for some time. If we can wake enough people up to start spending their money responsibly, and more importantly to start voting responsibly, things will start to get better around here.

Questions with this is: how? If a large percentage of individuals haven’t cared about their community enough to do these things before, what makes us think they’re capable of starting?

Basically, as long as people keep shopping at Walmart, keep buying foreign cars, keep calling backward countries for tech support, keep hiring border jumpers, and keep blindly voting party line or skin color…things will not only not get better, they’re going to get much worse with each passing year.

I think the right question to ask is how do we wake people up? How do we make them care enough about their community to start educating themselves to the damage their dollars and votes can do?

I don’t know the answer to that one…

Nov 17, 2011, 6:58 pm
-0 +0

Removing personhood from corporations would go a long way in removing their influence, “free speech” from politics. I’m not blaming or punching anyone.

This movement is not anti-capitalist or anti-government. But what we have now is not working.

It’s a work in progress that’s why the movement needs to stay very open and inclusive to let all voices be heard. That’s why there is a reluctance to start getting into making “demands”.

Do you feel heard at the local - state - regional or national level? That’s a problem. >40% of the population is involved in voting. I participated in a voter drive during the 2008 election. The #1 reason people didn’t vote was “it didn’t matter”.

The Occupy movement has already changed the debate within a couple of months. There is a chance of being heard and that is hope.

These encampments are not a risk to health or safety. They are not populated by “bums”. The unemployment rate mirrors the regional ones. They are strikenly ordinary people. They are bending over backwards to be peaceful, safe, clean and respectful - the golden rule. Most are people who did everything “right” and still got shafted in one way or another, or just tired of not being represented by who they elected.

But that’s something you’d have to see for yourself.

I was disillusioned and watching this movement gain steam gave me some hope again. Just protesting is too easily ignored. No one paid attention until they begain occuping. I didn’t realize it but there’s a history of camping out as a form of protest. Have we lost that right now too?

Nov 17, 2011, 7:02 pm
-0 +0

I ment to say < 40% vote (actually it’s more like 20% to 30%).

Nov 17, 2011, 7:10 pm
-0 +0

p.s. There is a film on YouTube called “Robert Newman’s History of Oil” that’s about 20 min long (or google it). He’s a british comedian so it’s not too painful to watch. The last third of the film he talks about individual action - which was the first time I’d heard the term used as a form of orgainizing. But that is the way of the future and how Occupy came into being.

The idea is to have leaderless movements and I agree with him now that’s what it takes for success. It’s almost like mesh networks and bit torrent in that it makes it nearly impossible to squash.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment


news, politics & government, business, crime & safety, downtown, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 151
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by


I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.


Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by