Comments on 'Mark Kelly on Esquire cover'
Sponsored by

Comments on

Mark Kelly on Esquire cover

The national media hullabaloo over U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and her husband Mark Kelly jumped a notch Monday, with word that Kelly is appearing on the cover of Esquire magazine.... Read more»

have your say   

6 comments on this story

Nov 14, 2011, 12:21 pm
-2 +1

This is news? Come on Dylan…

Nov 14, 2011, 12:51 pm
-1 +2

Of course it’s news, Bret.

You’re not a Giffords fan, to put it mildly, so you might interpret it as an unwarranted onslaught of publicity. Her supporters might say Gabby and Mark are an inspiration for the country.

Either way, this week’s media crush may not present much in the way of new information, but it’s news in and of itself.

Nov 14, 2011, 2:20 pm
-1 +1

@Dylan Smith

No, I’m not a Giffords fan, and yes, it is a most unwarranted onslaught of publicity. However, since you wrote this story you better than anyone else should know it’s not about Giffords, it’s about Kelly.

Kelly wasn’t elected to anything, nor was he shot. Before January 8, he didn’t even share a home with his wife, nor did they share a last name. Forgive me if I fail to see exactly how anyone can see Kelly as an inspiration.

I’m a married man. I love my wife. If something like that happened to her, there is no way in this world I could accept a single dime generated because of whatever hurt her, and still be able to sleep at night.

If this is indeed news as you insist it is Dylan, then that news is that Kelly is little more than an opportunistic scumbag who is trying to milk every dollar he can out of the hole in his wife’s head. It’s disgusting, it’s sickening, and it’s appalling.

Nov 14, 2011, 3:10 pm
-0 +2

Just checking, but you ARE taking the piss with your last paragraph here, right, Dylan? :-)

Nov 14, 2011, 3:39 pm
-0 +2

@Roberto De Vido

The world’s a curious enough place without having to Onion it up, Roberto. Go see the Esquire piece for yourself.

Nov 14, 2011, 4:07 pm
-0 +1

Printed the New York piece for train reading this morning. Will check out Esquire as well.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment


news, politics & government, crime & safety, health, media & journalism, sci/tech, local, arizona, nation/world, breaking, celebs/pop culture
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 541
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 153
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by


I want to help offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below) is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves. does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.


Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by