Sponsored by

Comments on

Horne: Outdated law requires feds review Az election changes

With the U.S. Supreme Court set to review a law that requires federal approval of any changes to Arizona’s election laws and procedures, Attorney General Tom Horne said Tuesday the measure has outlived its usefulness.... Read more»

have your say   

4 comments on this story

1
1460 comments
Nov 13, 2012, 10:06 pm
-0 +0

State election officials have faced stiff criticism and received national attention for what Goddard called a large number of provisional ballots used on election day. He said he’s heard and has a “hunch” that the majority of the provisional ballots were cast in minority areas.

What an idiot. The provisional mess was the direct result of bad mistakes made by the Recorder’s office, which a so-called “minority” has had a stranglehold on for the last two decades.

2
399 comments
Nov 13, 2012, 11:03 pm
-0 +0

@Bret Linden,

If responsibility can be laid on the recorders, why is every county in the state seeing the same difficulties?

3
1460 comments
Nov 14, 2012, 7:29 am
-0 +0

Dylan Smith wrote:

     
     
@Bret Linden,
If responsibility can be laid on the recorders, why is every county in the state seeing the same difficulties?

I am glad you asked.

I’m not going to try to speak to what goes on in other counties, but I have a difficult time believing they all made the same mistake I’m about to share. Besides, based on what I’ve been reading, none of the other counties are experiencing the troubles to the degree that we are. Anyway, here’s what I know…

On election day, my wife and I went to our polling place to vote, as true patriots do. As is the case with many married couples, my wife and I live together, and share a last name. So, it would stand to reason that either we would both be on the polling place’s roster, or neither of us would, right? Well, wasn’t the case…my wife’s name was on the roster, and mine was not. My wife got to vote the proper way, and I was forced to vote via provisional ballot (which STILL hasn’t been counted). Anyway, before election day, we each received those yellow cards telling us where our polling place is, and they both said the same thing. So, based on that and the sample ballot, I knew I was in the right place…well, that, and the whole married thing and living together and wife’s name on the roster thing…

Upset about this situation, I went to the recorder’s office in proper person, with sample ballot, yellow card, and voter registration card in hand, to register a complaint about this situation. I spoke to a very kind and professional gentleman. I am not going to reveal his name, because based on what I later read in the papers, he probably told me way too much (Rodriguez spoonfed that bullshit “don’t want to speculate” line to local media when asked what went wrong). I don’t want to do anything to jeopardize this guy’s employment or give him any headaches for doing the right thing and telling me what was really going on. Anyway, back to the story…

The guy looked at my materials, consulted his computer, and confirmed that both my wife and I did everything we were supposed to do, that we both went to the correct polling place, and that absolutely my name should have been on the polling place’s roster right next to my wife’s name. The guy promised he would look in to the situation, and give me a call to let me know what happened. True to his word, he did indeed call me the next morning to inform me of what he found out.

(continued…)

4
1460 comments
Nov 14, 2012, 7:30 am
-0 +0

(...continued)


The rosters were printed WAY too early, back in September. How do I know this? Well, comparing notes with the guy at the recorder’s office we determined they were printed well before the voter registration deadline, which was a stupid and irresponsible decision on the part of the Recorder’s office. My wife and I moved this summer (yes, together). Upon getting settled, we both went to the DMV’s website to change our address and re-register to vote. However, my wife did her’s about a week before I got around to doing mine.

So, the series of events went like this…my wife changed her address with the DMV, the rosters were printed, and then I changed my address with the DMV. This all happened in September. When is the voter registration deadline? Something like October 5? Whatever it was, I beat the clock with registering by a comfortable margin.

Now, to answer your question as to how this gets laid on the recorder. Something a huge as printing the polling places rosters early is a huge undertaking that she HAD to know about and HAD to have signed off on before it was done. It was a stupid mistake that should have never been made, should have never been suggested, should have never have been approved, and the recorder is ultimately responsible for her staff and what goes on in her office.

Having read what I just told you…if the blame for this situation doesn’t lie on the recorder, then I would love to read why not.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Natasha Khan/Cronkite News Service

See an interactive map of states or counties covered under the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act.

Categories

news, politics & government, family/life, local, arizona, breaking, Cronkite News
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1460
  • Dylan Smith: 399
  • Roberto De Vido: 269
  • buddhaboy: 238
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Joan: 86
  • scar: 83
  • janamg: 79
  • EllieMae: 78
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you indepedent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Donate securely with PayPal

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

OR: Subscribe and stretch your donation over time

$5/mo. Printer's Devil
$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

TucsonSentinel.com is fiscally sponsored by the Investigative News Network. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews