Will Seberger/TucsonSentinel.com
U.S. Rep. Ron Barber speaks to reporters after the sentencing.
Jan. 8 gunman Jared Loughner will spend the rest of his life behind bars. Several victims said at his sentencing hearing Thursday that he should spend his time remembering his crimes — among those who spoke was Mark Kelly, who stood in the courtroom with his wife, Gabrielle Giffords.... Read more»
Will Seberger/TucsonSentinel.com
U.S. Rep. Ron Barber speaks to reporters after the sentencing.
I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!
We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you indepedent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.
Donate securely with PayPal
OR: Subscribe and stretch your donation over time
TucsonSentinel.com is fiscally sponsored by the Investigative News Network. Your contribution is tax-deductible.
Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.
We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.
We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.
Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.
Keep in mind:
TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:
Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.
Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.
Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.
What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.
We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.
We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.
Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

4 comments on this story
I find it truly sad and unfortunate that no death penalty will be sought in this case.
I have no problem with the death penalty in cases with multiple, unimpeachable witnesses…but in THIS case..respecting the majority of the victims’ wishes is the most important thing.
Bret- The death penalty went unsought after consultation with the survivors. Several of them, I know after talking to them, are opposed to the death penalty.
Ted Prezelski reported:
I understand that. Doesn’t change my opinion. The only thing it changed was my desire to elaborate on my opinion. If that’s what they want then that’s what they want…I don’t understand it, I can’t relate to it, but whatever. I will acknowledge that the victims have earned the right to have their opinions and desires heard.
The most I’m going to say over and above that is that, were I in their place, I would have asked someone to pursue the death penalty.